striking

60 ms·

811.
by striking 6y ago
When?
812.
by striking 6y ago
I think this is true for any RDBMS, though. If your block device has high latency, you will see bad perf when the DB tries to fsync.
813.
by striking 6y ago
There's a CLI. I honestly just end up using the browser extension...
814.
by striking 6y ago
I actually don't hate `file.existsAtCurrentInstant`. `file.exists` is so misused. Maybe functions suitable for crypto use should be in their own "crypto primitives" package.
815.
by striking 6y ago
It was likely only on your local shelf in the first place because of growth hacking; the fact that it's gone doesn't mean they won't be able to continue the brand or keep making great ice cream. And maybe it will come back, o
816.
by striking 6y ago
Is it really so unfortunate? They seem to still be operating[1][2][3], just without the froth. 1: https://www.amplehills.com/ 2: https://twitter.com/amplehills 3: https://order.trycaviar.com&#x2F
817.
by striking 6y ago
For anyone else who wants to take a peek for themselves at the concerns raised in this comment: https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:https:... Another thing that doesn't seem to line up with reality is
818.
by striking 6y ago
At my workplace, we have a few blocks of time scattered around the schedule for teammates to just jump in and code with other people. No agenda, no one is required to join. But a few always do, because it's so pleasant.
819.
by striking 6y ago
What a strangely uncivil response. I was trying to meet folks in the middle here and at least kindly suggest some attribution as a reply to some now (appreciably) deleted grumbling. I'm not trying to impress anyone by suggesting it, it
820.
by striking 6y ago
I understand the urge to handwave away copyright or whatever, but it would be nice to at least see some attribution or the links from which you obtained the fonts. The people who made the content you're redistributing would probably ap
821.
by striking 6y ago
Hugged to death. Archive link: https://archive.is/bpvKq
822.
by striking 6y ago
I think you may have missed the thrust of the earlier comment (which is that some developers may elect to never use libraries that use generics, whereas some developers may prefer libraries that use generics, and it could cause a schism in
823.
by striking 6y ago
I think that's the point of the reply, that we'll get codebases that aren't mutually compatible due to a resistance of or lean towards using generics. I'm not so certain that that's the case, but it is an interestin
824.
by striking 6y ago
It can't be atomic if it's done `CONCURRENTLY`. You can't even do that in a transaction, Postgres will tell you it won't work. By using `CONCURRENTLY`, you're making it clear that you will handle atomicity yourself,
825.
by striking 6y ago
Someone is working on that: https://github.com/masm11/emacs
826.
by striking 6y ago
Well, you can't just delete it. It is an object that was created by some user and there's no good reason for the database to get rid of it automatically. The database keeps a record of the invalid thing, even though it is invali
827.
by striking 6y ago
I appreciate you coming back to the thread to give an example. However, the comment appears to no longer be downvoted or flagged. This illustrates a common misconception about HN's propensity to vote one way or another. Your reply came
828.
by striking 6y ago
I've heard people 'just ask questions' or 'make observations' or similar a million times before, and you most certainly have comments that fit the profile of what you've been arguing in favor of. It reads like
829.
by striking 6y ago
Although it does seem a little meta, I'd like to do you the favor of telling you why I downvote every time I see someone complain about their downvotes or their post being grayed out. It's boring. It doesn't make for good con
830.
by striking 6y ago
How do you feel about the fact that these existed and were outlawed? https://ballotpedia.org/Literacy_as_a_requirement_for_voting
831.
by striking 6y ago
If you read the complaint, it describes more than one conspirator.
832.
by striking 6y ago
I hate to raise a seemingly obvious point, but this doesn't seem like a problem with Docker.
833.
by striking 6y ago
You can collapse threads you no longer intend to read.
834.
by striking 6y ago
Which store, if you wouldn't mind me asking?
835.
by striking 6y ago
I've run it inside a container and not experienced tremendous issues with RAM or CPU usage, but this is for very few auth calls per day. Also, I needed to apply some not-obvious environment / config changes to make it work behind
836.
by striking 6y ago
> [some dumb thing about women for some reason, and also] our society even systematically rewards and encourages cowardry by reframing it as smartness or sober-mindedness is definitely arguing for some kind of honor or strength system.
837.
by striking 6y ago
It's worth noting, I'm mostly not defending Lua here. I enjoyed my time with it, and then when I put it down I realized how unhappy I was with it. There's no language I really truly love, but the one I find myself recommendin
838.
by striking 6y ago
I think Lua accounted for the idea of desugaring, where PUC-Rio said that they didn't want the added complexity, but I don't think I could readily find that justification. This is just another one of those situations where Lua is
839.
by striking 6y ago
The point about GraphQL seems misdirected. GraphQL works fine with Postgres as long as you are using (working) dataloaders appropriately, I promise. I'm afraid I don't understand why a non-Postgres DB should be chosen for GraphQL
840.
by striking 6y ago
I gave you an upvote because I think you don't deserve to go negative just for raising some of these concerns. Still, I'm going to examine some of them. With regards to variables, the best way to hack around this issue is to 1) al

More ›