Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
still_grokking
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
5 ms
·
1.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
> I think it’s hard to argue that the amount of justice is unchanged for all of human history I agree. It got worse. The inequality between people was never so high in history! Hard fact. Now some people "earn" more money whi
2.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
> This is my experience with all Microsoft software. The worst thought out, buggy, untested pile of crap. > There's something seriously wrong in Redmond. I'd say: There is something seriously wrong with the people buying thi
3.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
LOL The world has always be run by oligarchs, and nothing changed since ten thousands of years. Most people today on this planet are still slaves.
4.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
> you only need to look at reddit's degoogle subreddit A drop in the ocean… Google is constantly rushing from growth record to growth record in the last years.
5.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
No, they fail all the time. You just don't notice all the bullshit if you're not already an expert in the field you generate LLM output for.
6.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
For anything where "the answer" wasn't already in the training data you just get some arbitrary correlated tokens out, as that's all a LLM can do. Of course the meaning of these tokens is just random. (And even for thing
7.
▲
by
still_grokking
2mo ago
That's some of the most weird anthropomorphization of a next token predictor I've read in a while… This things output token which are correlated with the context given. That's all! If you feed it some context the parrot wil
8.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
I've said I'm not sure about the validity of that reasoning. I've liked it nevertheless for context, as augmentation to parent's post.
9.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Exactly! Completely new languages without large amounts of reference material are terrible for LLMs.
10.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Or it's just some AI brain fart… The whole things looks vibe-coded, and vibe-designed.
11.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
You're looking for Scala… ;-) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47957121
12.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
That's in large parts Scala. It doesn't have Hindley-Milner type inference, but it has very strong type inference. We will get linearity soon thanks to and as part of the Capybara[1] effort. Refinement types are already long a rea
13.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Why would you need "header files" when a LSP server can give you just the outline of some file?
14.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Why would anybody use a vibe-coded and vibe-desinged language which effectively does not exist yet instead of an established one with such features, like Scala? https://arxiv.org/html/2510.11151v1
15.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Wasn't that legalize the reason Gram got created? https://gram.liten.app/
16.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Yeah, that's great! Imagine we would download random code from the internet and just execute it, like with NPM, PIP, Maven, Cargo etc.
17.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
How about SELinux, like on Android?
18.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Will this continue like that even when the prophesied Mythos Vulnocalypse hits the Kernel? This stance doesn't seem sustainable any more to me.
19.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
As I did not know what AF_ALG is in the first place I've searched for it and found this here: https://www.chronox.de/libkcapi/html/ch01s02.html It states the following: > There are several reasons for AF_A
20.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Can someone ELI5 that for me? Is this the mathematician's variant of "my language is better than your language", or what does this post actually discus? Something fundamental in the philosophy underpinning things or just the
21.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
> the only real advantage for local models (privacy/secrecy) hasn't proven convincing for broader IT either Because of nonexistent regulation. Just wait for it… The legal situation in for example the EU is crystal clear, only t
22.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Looks like the Chinese are, again, winning the long game. There is simply nothing that could compete with their open models. At the same time more and more corps got "AI addicted", so they will either have to pay ridiculous amount
23.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
Their vibe-coded "documentation" sucks so much…
24.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
If you want to keep your shiny Apple stuff you're effectively trapped. Their walled garden approach works extremely well…
25.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
The "quality" Apple delivers is by now a complete joke. It's going south since over a decade, and this never stopped. It's like that because people are still buying. Even for the ridiculous prices Apple asks for. So why
26.
▲
by
still_grokking
5mo ago
This "test" makes no sense. Cyan, and especially turquoise are neither blue nor green, they are a mix (similar to orange between red / yellow). I had actually a very hard time to answer the questions, needed to overlay most o
27.
▲
by
still_grokking
7mo ago
> GrapheneOS had to sign some sort of non-disclosure for them, in order to roll them into updates. So doesn't this mean GrapheneOS is effectively controlled by Google now? Also, how is keeping anything secret under NDA possible at a
28.
▲
by
still_grokking
7mo ago
Just to switch to an even more aggressively monitored and tightly controlled walled garden? People sometimes act as if the one would be an viable alternative to the other. Even both are effectively the exact same shit for the exact same rea
29.
▲
by
still_grokking
7mo ago
Don't forget that Apple is spying on their users even more then Google does (which is gross in its own). Apple controls much more user data then Google does. At the same time Apple keeps telling their users some fairy-tales about "
30.
▲
by
still_grokking
7mo ago
That escalated quickly. I think that's actually true. But what does it mean, what's the way forward?
More ›