Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
staticman2
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
91.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
I know I saw Geoffrey Hinton say humans operate with much less training data in a talk. It doesn't strike me as a claim that should be controversial. As far as I know nobody can train A.I. to push a shopping cart based on a human chil
92.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
Your wiktionary link indicates it is not a common expression in English but instead something "rationalist community" people say.
93.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
What's laughable is an OpenAI employee invented the term "PHD level intelligence" and you think that " PHD Level intelligence" is a real term that describes a real thing and you are repeating it here.
94.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
Most people probably want to get a game and play it without figuring out how to navigate pirate web sites.
95.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
Is it possible that a lot of people are hoping for a dot-com bubble 2.0 so they can sell at the market peak before it pops? That would explain why they're ignoring fundamentals. They could think that OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs will driv
96.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
For what it's worth my Coinbase account, which I've never used for anything but sign up bonuses, seems to be linked to Google Pay but not a bank account. I just checked and I can still log in.
97.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
Good point. I meant like Tinkerbell.
98.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
If you didn't call GPT 3.5 AGI I do not believe you when you claim you would have called 5.5 AGI.
99.
▲
by
staticman2
5mo ago
Hobbits are between two and four feet tall. I think the "little people" in the article are more fairy sized or smaller. The BBC article linked to at that article says they were seen on dishes.
100.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
Are those "smart people you know" machine learning researchers?
101.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
> and turns out it can do it Not really- if you had examined the output closely you probably would have seen noticed it conflated chapter 13 and 14 or 14 and 15. Or you got very lucky on a generation. It definitely doesn't exactly k
102.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
> This might sound callous, but I wonder if people saying this themselves have very limited brains more akin to stochastic parrots rather the average homo sapiens. I have a different theory. Aside from a few exceptions like Blake Lemoine
103.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I wouldn't expect an AI to know exactly what happens in every chapter of a book. Knowing the plot of Neuromancer isn't the same as being able to recite a chapter by chapter summary. I tried this Neuromancer query a few times and r
104.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I'm curious: did you give Gemini the entire text of Neuromancer or did you expect it to use search results for chapters 1 to 14? I would have just fed it the text of chapters 1 to 14 from a non drm copy.
105.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
The first Cyberpunk book, Neuromancer, has a plot which revolves around A.I recruiting human agents to forward its plans...
106.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I've found Gemini works better for search when used through a Perplexity subscription. (Though these things can quickly change).
107.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I played around with it and its better than it used to be but if you ask it something like "Whats the name of the third book in the peripheral trilogy going to be" it just regurgitates some dumb reddit comment by someone who seems
108.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I'm not the person you replied to but I'm wondering which Google AI product you are referring to that you use for search which is so excellent that you need someone to find for you an example of it failing? I think Google has seve
109.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
By that logic a Markov chain is better on average just for the fact that it was trained on a large corpus of human knowledge, including psychology, therapy and study material.
110.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
I've definitely posted to the same subreddit with two different accounts by accident without being banned. The android reddit app annoyingly doesn't check for account matches. If you click a browser notification link on Account A
111.
▲
by
staticman2
6mo ago
You are exaggerating, right? They didn't really fire the entire Arc team did they? I couldn't find a source saying that.
112.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
42 wasn't a low quality answer. The joke revolves around the incongruity of "42" being precisely correct.
113.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
Even if America is an empire and VoA is propaganda "Imperial Manager" doesn't seem very descriptive of what a judge does.
114.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
Are you talking about the same thing everyone else is? Imagine the conversation went like this: A: "Maybe we shouldn't sacrifice 500 virgins to the Aztec God to predict the harvest next hear?" B "Why not? Killing virgins
115.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
Adding web search doesn't necessarily lead to better information at any context. In my experience the model will assume the web results are the answer even if the search engine returns irrelevant garbage. For example you ask it a quest
116.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
> If you took Einstein at 40 and surgically removed his hippocampus so he can't learn anything he didn't already know (meaning no online learning), that's still a very useful AGI. I like how people are accepting this dubio
117.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
There is no right to vote in the constitution as written and interpreted in the 1700s. There is also no guarantee of freedom of speech. The first amendment was considered a rule that only applied federally. What's democratically illegi
118.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
What doesn't make any sense is proposing the constitution be interpreted as it was when there was no general right to vote or general right to political speech... then claiming this is the "voters decide" option.
119.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
Pretty sure you don't go through an x-ray conveyor belt when you exit a plane. I think something was lost in the telling. I could see a kiosk worker saying this or similar.
120.
▲
by
staticman2
7mo ago
> I personally have a theory that the parting gift of the Baby Boomer generation will be to get rid of Social Security and Medicare since they don't need it anymore. They do need social security and Medicare. Studies show even with
More ›