starbugs

50 ms·

481.
by starbugs 7y ago
gandi.net doesn't support external domains. I'd be thankful for any recommendations that aren't totally overpriced and allow for external domains.
482.
How to run your own mail server (2017)(c0ffee.net)
389 points by starbugs 7y ago|262 comments
483.
by starbugs 7y ago
Yeah me too, but I don't like accidentally touching something and then being out of context. Also happens with the gigantic track pad. It's really annoying.
484.
by starbugs 7y ago
I predict that from now on the touch bar will slowly become smaller and smaller until it disappears completely. It would have been better if they'd gotten rid of it entirely in one iteration though.
485.
Await-to-JS – Async await wrapper for Go-like error handling without try-catch(github.com)
1 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
486.
Node.js database migration management for PostgreSQL(github.com)
1 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
487.
by starbugs 7y ago
Being able to write algorithms is a different thing than being able to do it without any reference or documentation on the state of the art, basically from scratch and from the top of your head, as commonly found in interview situations. Th
488.
by starbugs 7y ago
I picked bubble sort, because it's literally the example from the first sentence of the article: > David Hansson, the creator of Ruby on Rails, admitted in a tweet that he wouldn’t be able to write bubble sort on a whiteboard.
489.
by starbugs 7y ago
I would go as far as saying that an "artist" might be detrimental to reaching your goal in a lot of cases, especially if a team is involved.
490.
by starbugs 7y ago
Yes, being able to write a DFS is definitely a good thing. For more complex stuff I don't mind if you need to look it up.
491.
by starbugs 7y ago
But it's not written in Electron, which is my point.
492.
by starbugs 7y ago
> Programmers can’t write algorithms without help And that might be a good thing. How often does a normal software engineer have to write bubble sort from scratch in his daily life? If someone from my team came to me telling me he had to
493.
by starbugs 7y ago
I manage to get these numbers with Sublime Text on a big project. Sublime Text is native.
494.
by starbugs 7y ago
That's an interesting thesis. Could you explain why?
495.
LocalStack – A fully-functional local AWS cloud stack(github.com)
226 points by starbugs 7y ago|30 comments
496.
by starbugs 7y ago
You might want to have a look at https://www.boden.io . Looks as if this might greatly simplify the task of sharing business logic (and UI if needed/desired).
497.
by starbugs 7y ago
Can anyone shed some light on whether using a service like this may be a legal concern? I recently read that at least in the EU dynamic/personalized pricing can be illegal if it discriminates groups based on certain criteria.
498.
History of open-source C++ GUI libraries [Reddit](reddit.com)
6 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
499.
by starbugs 7y ago
Maybe that's part of it, yes. I mean if I press Cmd+P to look up a source file and Firefox doesn't suggest the source mapped one before the ES5 compiled one, it's already beyond me how I should ever seriously work with that t
500.
by starbugs 7y ago
I'll give you an example: If I place a breakpoint in a DOM mutation listener, I would like to have the same order of DOM events as if I wouldn't have placed it there.
501.
by starbugs 7y ago
PIP is a good point, not supporting play/stop via Bluetooth is another for me personally.
502.
by starbugs 7y ago
Not surprised, but a bit baffled why they allowed for uBO for such a long time in the first place? It looks as if they misused the community's products and trust to build their monopoly and then kick us out once it's gotten hard e
503.
CppCon 2019: Non-conforming C++: What the Committee Is Hiding From You [video](youtube.com)
4 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
504.
What is the most misunderstood C++ keyword and why is it 'inline'?(twitter.com)
1 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
505.
PhotoEditor SDK HTML5 Demo(photoeditorsdk.com)
2 points by starbugs 7y ago|0 comments
506.
by starbugs 7y ago
Please consider a not so deeply technical solution. You can do more than creating yet another programming language. I bet if you did, the next rant would be about your language and its shortcomings. Even a very small constructive contributi
507.
by starbugs 7y ago
We've been stuck in this for at least a decade now. That is what I am referring to with "I am not satisfied with the status quo of the discussion". The author of this specific article doesn't even seem to consider that t
508.
by starbugs 7y ago
A certain subset of technical people seems to be unable to understand how it can happen that — what they believe to be — technically inferior solutions can win major market share and become the defacto standard for decades to come. Don&#x27
509.
by starbugs 7y ago
Proprietary software is not open source and this is a way to monetize open source, which could be beneficial for the open source community as a whole?
510.
by starbugs 7y ago
It doesn't matter. That's the beautiful thing about being the owner of Chrome, which kind of is "the web" now. Open specs and industry standards are basically what you propose and accept. And you get the data anyway rega

More ›