ssaew333

5 ms·

1.
by ssaew333 8y ago
>It has democratized thought so well such that people whose ideas are morally depraved have the same ability to reach an audience that those whose ideas are praiseworthy are. I don't think a majority of people hold these views. What
2.
by ssaew333 8y ago
My search was on search.twitter.com I don't have a twitter account The results have been changing. The newer you go, the more you see "radical vegan" and the less you see "jihad." That's... .encouraging.
3.
by ssaew333 8y ago
Or, democracy and mob rule are not the same thing. And the internet (in it's current form) is better at promoting mob rule.
4.
by ssaew333 8y ago
I thought it was clear from my post i was guesstimating. I don't typically do rigorous analysis of what I see in twitter results, so I'll just say, it seemed like a lot of right wing accounts implying that media was covering up th
5.
by ssaew333 8y ago
I wasn't complaining about labeling. I was complaining because assertions that she was an NRA or ISIS supporter were false. I believe my assertions were true. Here are the first two people I saw on my twitter search: Jack Posobiec Wik
6.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Yeah Mark's getting older, and we all know young people are just smarter. Time to shake things up. /s
7.
by ssaew333 9y ago
If you search her name on twitter, around 40% of what you see is right wing conspiracy theorists who assert, without evidence, that she was a member of ISIS. I also noticed a smaller percentage of people asserting, again without evidence, t
8.
by ssaew333 9y ago
I didn't have contact with any Russians, but if I did, they were completely proper, and if they weren't, then their efforts didn't influence the election and if they did, Why shouldn't I do everything it takes to win?
9.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Is this really a technique? I thought it was a core concept of argumentation: don't unnecessarily cede ground.
10.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Oh goody, more javascript. Infinite scroll. Less room for content, more room for sidebars and doohickeys. The internet is a huge pile of garbage.
11.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Look what I found at the bottom of the article: "Released under Creative Commons NoDerivatives License 4.0" So you can distribute this freely, as long as you acknowledge the author. And since it's content, not software, it&#x
12.
by ssaew333 9y ago
> I would like to question the "most" there though. Good point! Definitely had blinders on when I wrote that.
13.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Musician here. For most local bands, nobody discovers you on Spotify. People find out about your band because you shared a show with another band they like. After you are discovered by the new fan, they may later search for you on Spotify.
14.
by ssaew333 9y ago
> If you want to go to a cheap concert, become a fan of artists that people richer than you don't like. This contradicts the egalitarian ethos most musicians and their fans espouse.
15.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Move fast. Break things.
16.
by ssaew333 9y ago
>And it is also possible to intentionally structure some sounds in a way as to be not music, or unmusic No it isn't.
17.
by ssaew333 9y ago
Na, definitely music. It's based in sound. It's meant for you to listen to, and appreciate like other music. You could just say it's bad music. As in you don't like it.
18.
by ssaew333 9y ago
No worries. The incarceration rate for women is catching up to men: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/aug/17/women-incarc... Mission accomplished?