ss108

37 ms·

391.
by ss108 4y ago
That's pretty much the normal state of affairs--out-going admin people of whatever party always benefit from the revolving door. Didn't work as well for Trump Administration officials because a large percentage of them are clowns
392.
by ss108 4y ago
Bro what
393.
by ss108 4y ago
You have merely cherry-picked some examples of cancel culture where people were fired for merely trivial things. > If Musk has said something like "employers shouldn't fire employees on the basis of their speech" (and he m
394.
by ss108 4y ago
"It just means we won't throw you in jail using the state for it. But you may just lose your jobs. Thems' the breaks." This is a misrepresentation of the current "debate" taking place regarding free speech, a d
395.
by ss108 4y ago
And all the people getting cancelled said and did x bad thing, but Musk's sycophants and defenders, who tend to be free speech absolutists, act like people should be immune from the consequences of their actions.
396.
by ss108 4y ago
This demonstrates something I kept say while people were dunking on Bloomberg for spending a bunch of money to try to get the Dem nomination in 2020 were being silly; for him, it was like the equivalent of buying new furniture or taking a v
397.
by ss108 4y ago
Microsoft Edge
398.
by ss108 4y ago
I also have immense difficulty doing basic text ops on mobile phones.
399.
by ss108 4y ago
a) The point is, it's not a "random rich person", and we all know it's not. He's not some random guy with 200m net worth. He one of the richest and most powerful tech entrepreneurs in the world. Like among the top 5
400.
by ss108 4y ago
1) It's not incorrect just because there may be other ways of calculating wealth. 2) It doesn't matter if he's actually 1st, 3rd, or 10th in terms of wealth. Him being literally the richest is not a necessary assumption or pr
401.
by ss108 4y ago
Test
402.
by ss108 4y ago
What?
403.
by ss108 4y ago
And "to" means "you"
404.
by ss108 4y ago
It seems that less and less such devices are being produced.
405.
by ss108 4y ago
To be clear (though I think this is obvious), this site does not seem very representative of the views and general perspective of North American Muslims. Also, this article doesn't even seem to link to the actual discussion! It's
406.
by ss108 4y ago
Very cool, seems useful.
407.
by ss108 4y ago
Muslim, and I've never heard this logic at all. It's really more about hypocrisy and self-interest. I really discourage people from taking the above post as an accurate representation of Muslim views.
408.
by ss108 4y ago
That's still good.
409.
by ss108 4y ago
Indeed
410.
by ss108 4y ago
Whether or not that's a morally defensible position that you take, you can still defend it. If the rest of us judge you an enemy, why not consider that our problem or error? If you have cogent reasons for shrugging at the existence of
411.
by ss108 4y ago
Can you elaborate or point to a source? This is highly relevant to my interests.
412.
by ss108 4y ago
Why do you feel the need to "mimic" anyone in that respect?
413.
by ss108 4y ago
Don't give people like that the excuse of mental illness. They are morally responsible for choosing to consume and believe that crap.
414.
by ss108 4y ago
I wondered beforehand how they were going to manage it, and indeed, they cancelled my order and refunded me (for the og full price of the meal).
415.
by ss108 4y ago
No worries. I agree with you in opposition to the notion that we should even have direct democracy for most, if not all, issues.
416.
by ss108 4y ago
Obviously not. It's a comment on the journalistic integrity of the Post and any other publication spreading the obviously fake news about her health ailments, and about how we process and evaluate info, not on the relative merits of Cl
417.
by ss108 4y ago
Which fact does nothing to support the above poster's contention that "i’m sure california already have diversity hiring quotas for race!"
418.
by ss108 4y ago
Why are you sure? Do you have some evidence or sources on this? What about the proposed constitutional amendment/proposition to permit certain types of affirmative action currently prohibited, which was rejected by California voters?
419.
by ss108 4y ago
"The frenzy arguably culminated with the notorious 2017 Charlottesville incident, when a woman was killed in a vehicle collision by someone understood to be a Nazi." Uhh that was a fucking intentional murder, of which the perp was
420.
by ss108 4y ago
I wouldn't trust NYPost posting a story like this about Hillary Clinton, and I don't trust it about this either. I only trust it about relatively non-sensational NYC happenings.

More ›