ss108

39 ms·

421.
by ss108 4y ago
Lawfare is not an obscure legal blog, it's a highly regarded legal publication featuring a lot of expert analysis. The fact you dismissed it as "one guy's legal blog" is a good indication you're not very adept at as
422.
by ss108 4y ago
The real threat is that people believe it and defend it.
423.
by ss108 4y ago
There was a lot of debate over whether Trump even could be indicted, whether Mueller would even if he had the evidence, etc., and such discussions did make it into coverage by the "mainstream media" (I am generally wary of people
424.
by ss108 4y ago
What is this ice cream strawman? Dude popped off with lies and idiotic remarks routinely, was proud of an inhumane immigration policy, wanted to yank people's healthcare, cozied up to dictators, etc. It's disgusting how much some
425.
by ss108 4y ago
Except it did materialize. There were indictments that arose from that investigation, and we know they were interested in acquiring Russian "dirt" on Clinton. If you expected something more dramatic or obvious, that's uninfor
426.
by ss108 4y ago
If his comment initially said "Ira Glass", it would not be pedantic to point that out. Nontrivial error given that there is a famous Ira Glass lol
427.
by ss108 4y ago
What areas re: "poor and marginalized" are you referring to? Seems like there are numerous focused orgs for all of the issues they work on, no?
428.
by ss108 4y ago
whoosh ?
429.
by ss108 4y ago
Interestingly, competition is worse for consumers in some respects here. It's resulting in fragmentation of the market such that people are too many services for 1-2 shows each
430.
by ss108 4y ago
Interesting, thanks. I feel like nobody brings up other countries when it comes to abortion, but the context seems pretty helpful (as it is for most issues, I suppose). Esp since, looking at Australia and Canada, people get on and tolerate
431.
by ss108 4y ago
I had a lot of convo with that poster in another thread. I would suggest not wasting your time by engaging with him, and I say this as someone who agrees with him in certain respects.
432.
by ss108 4y ago
"and there’s maybe a case to be made for him exercising that power here to fire all of them if they cannot definitively prove who it was after investigation in order to defend the integrity of the Court’s deliberation process. If they
433.
by ss108 4y ago
International norms?
434.
by ss108 4y ago
What would be some attributes or examples of a good answer?
435.
by ss108 4y ago
It applies way harder and more cruelly to women as far as dating goes. A physically unattractive man with a good personality + social skills can do very well with women. Same cannot really be said of a physically unattractive woman.
436.
by ss108 4y ago
I think in the case of Putin, there may be some justification on the basis that he and his supporters (including in the West) portray him as super macho, etc. On balance though, I think I agree with you.
437.
by ss108 4y ago
I don't think you're wrong to point this out, but it's also obvious that nobody is discriminating against men for being short or women for being fat the way people discriminate and have discriminated against people for being
438.
by ss108 4y ago
Without getting into the merits of his statement, he didn't say it was the exclusive provence of that group. Most x do y An x does y --> not surprising A z does y --> doesn't mean the other two propositions are now wrong
439.
by ss108 4y ago
...you're not short. facepalm According to the article, if you're in the US, that's an inch above average.
440.
by ss108 4y ago
You're missing the point; not all of those guys are engaging in the kinds of self-improvement and development that could help them have experiences similar to the person to whom you are responding. For an individual short guy, the quan
441.
by ss108 4y ago
? Seems like a generally healthy attitude to me, though that poster may be taking it to an extreme.
442.
by ss108 4y ago
Tinder is fine. I'm 5'7 or 5'8 (I don't even know really). I do alright on there. Scott's problem is he's on social media (particularly Tik Tok) and apparently works or worked in a toxic environment.
443.
by ss108 4y ago
Whatever framework and language you know best, with however best you know how to deploy. If you have previous projects from which you can copy and paste code, it's not even a question, IMO.
444.
by ss108 4y ago
lol I really don't like Elon Musk, but I think you're correct on this point.
445.
by ss108 4y ago
I believe there was some vigorous opposition to the Iraq War and its premise by many experts, but they got drowned out in the jingoism, no? In any case, I don't know how it's justifiable for anyone to say "Colin Powell fucked
446.
by ss108 4y ago
Nobody is being "politically excluded", they just don't want to live in SF or NYC.
447.
by ss108 4y ago
Yes, I used it to incorporate recently and we are early in the "post-incorporation steps" process. So I don't have that much knowledge, unfortunately, but I am a user.
448.
by ss108 4y ago
I can only speak to Clerky, and they don't seem to. At certain points, they say things like "if you intend to do x, you should consult a lawyer"
449.
by ss108 4y ago
Just use Clerky or Stripe or Gusto. Lawyers tend to be absurd wastes of money. (Source: am currently in biglaw--not that you'd need to hire such a firm for this, but rule still applies)
450.
by ss108 4y ago
Haha Indeed, as others have said, Batman is a libertarian fantasy

More ›