sqs

10 ms·

61.
by sqs 2y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. We stopped making a standalone Electron app (which was an experiment) and instead remained focused on our web app and editor extensions. You can use Cody in your editor with no server needed. We didn’t fizzle out. :)
62.
by sqs 2y ago
Haha, yeah, @jdorfman's sibling comment mentions the tools we use. Any mentions on HN, Reddit, Twitter, YouTube, etc., show up in our team chat. The gold standard, of course, is Sid at GitLab ("GitLab CEO here" :).
63.
by sqs 2y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. It’s not $99/user/month anymore. It’s great that a lot of companies were willing to pay that, but we and our customers prefer a lower per-user price and a higher % of devs at the company using it (ideally 100
64.
by sqs 2y ago
Confirmed. Not affiliated in any way.
65.
by sqs 2y ago
I am the Sourcegraph CEO. I don't know who this person is, and he is not affiliated with Sourcegraph, although I am grateful for his kind words! This is not an instance of what you're talking about. I do agree with you that we&#x2
66.
by sqs 2y ago
You can try out GitHub Copilot Workspace now in read-only mode: https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/AnandChowdhary/anan...
67.
by sqs 2y ago
Cool idea! Agree on the end vision. The alpha is in figuring out how to get there and making it work really well along the way. Also, why isn’t anybody connecting the Copilot Workspace announcement to Devin? Biggest company in the world an
68.
by sqs 2y ago
Very cool idea! I got rejected from Y Combinator in 2006 for a similar idea. Still surprised nobody has done this. Congrats on the launch!
69.
by sqs 2y ago
Thanks for the feedback and I’m sorry you had an awful experience here. We’re working on improving Cody for JetBrains a lot (our VS Code extension was first and JetBrains is in beta). This is helpful feedback and I hope we can earn your tru
70.
by sqs 2y ago
Why do you go back to Copilot after trying Cody? (I’m the Sourcegraph CEO, and we make Cody.) We added Claude 3 Opus editor chat and also support GPT-4 Turbo. Curious, why don’t you use in-editor chat? If you find those models helpful, then
71.
by sqs 3y ago
The code is Apache 2 and we linked it from the blog post. You can see all of the tricks! Nothing here is dishonest. We’re open about the limitations of the LLM being the main determining factor, and the numerous languages we’ve prioritized
72.
by sqs 3y ago
I'm at Sourcegraph (mentioned in the blog post). We obviously have to deal with massive scale, but for anyone starting out adding code search to their product, I'd recommend not starting with an index and just doing on-the-fly sea
73.
by sqs 3y ago
The list of supported languages is at https://sourcegraph.com/docs/cody/faq#what-programming-langu... . It works for all programming languages, but it works better on some than others, depending on the LLM and the
74.
by sqs 3y ago
You're free to use the workflow used by the Linux kernel, but a lot of people prefer Graphite because it is easier to use and integrates with GitHub PRs better. If you find value in Graphite (as many devs do), then you can pay $30 and
75.
by sqs 3y ago
Cody ( https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody ) supports using Ollama for autocomplete in VS Code. See the release notes at https://sourcegraph.com/blog/cody-vscode-1.1.0-release for instructions. And
76.
by sqs 3y ago
Congrats on founding a company here!
77.
by sqs 3y ago
Also one feature request - if the library (or another related library) could also transparently spin up a local Ollama instance if the user doesn’t have one already. “Transparent-on-demand-Ollama” or something.
78.
by sqs 3y ago
I posted about my awesome experiences using Ollama a few months ago: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37662915 . Ollama is definitely the easiest way to run LLMs locally, and that means it’s the best building block for a
79.
by sqs 3y ago
Awesome list. A few more I’d add: - search engine - web crawler
80.
by sqs 3y ago
Yes!
81.
by sqs 3y ago
It’s from Feb 2023. Many people on HN are probably familiar with the point it makes by now.
82.
by sqs 3y ago
Wow, I love that it shows live flights and airplanes!
83.
by sqs 3y ago
I'm sorry about that. Checking to see why you have not heard back yet. I'll follow up by email (assuming the email in your profile is correct).
84.
by sqs 3y ago
Ollama is awesome. I am part of a team building a code AI application[1], and we want to give devs the option to run it locally instead of only supporting external LLMs from Anthropic, OpenAI, etc. Those big remote LLMs are incredibly power
85.
by sqs 3y ago
The information that leaked was not collected from self-hosted instances. It was from Sourcegraph.com, which contains generally less sensitive information than self-hosted instances. See https://about.sourcegraph.com/blog&#x
86.
by sqs 3y ago
A couple WIP ones: https://github.com/keegancsmith/emacs-cody and https://github.com/j-shilling/lsp-cody . Our head of eng (Steve Yegge) is going to start hacking on one this week, I hear. :)
87.
by sqs 3y ago
Awesome. The repository is at https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody for anyone who hasn't seen it yet.
88.
by sqs 3y ago
If you're worried about hitting your rate limit right now, don't worry. We are lenient; you can join our Discord and ask for a higher one if needed. Right now, unfortunately, you can disable autocomplete entirely in the Cody menu
89.
by sqs 3y ago
Sorry. You don't need to pay for embeddings. What did not work for you? If the desktop app is where you ran into trouble, you can start with the editor extension (see https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody#readme ) an
90.
by sqs 3y ago
Great to hear you're getting a ton of value out of it! On the other parts you mentioned: Overly positive English prose in Markdown is probably a function of the underlying LLM in use (Claude/GPT-4, plus experimental support for ot

More ›