Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
sqs
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
13 ms
·
91.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Awesome. Check out the existing docs for "bring your own LLM account" on the server side at https://docs.sourcegraph.com/cody/overview/enable-cody-enter... , and let us know if that suffices or if more is
92.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
It's something we'd like to add (and you can follow along at https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody ), but in beta we're still focused on making it really lovable on the most popular config path rather than
93.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Yes, it will. And if you have specific things in mind you want to ask it (or kinds of code you want it to generate for you), we always love to hear that kind of stuff (in a discussion topic at https://github.com/sourcegraph&
94.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
We've got some experimental work to support that. Not merged yet, but you can follow https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody . I've been polling Twitter ( https://twitter.com/sqs/status/16
95.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
There's an (experimental) Cody CLI: https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody/tree/main/cli . If you try it and like it, let us know over on that repo! (Or if by headless you just mean "editor extensi
96.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
We're working on rolling that all into the editor extension itself, so if you just have the Cody editor extension now, you'll see it getting better context. Can follow along at https://github.com/sourcegraph/c
97.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
I’m sorry about that. Our code ( https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody ), which is open source (Apache 2), doesn’t do anything to move the cursor, so I have no idea how that would have happened. Would you be willing to try
98.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Sorry for this bad experience. We are working on improving this (code/activity at https://github.com/sourcegraph/cody ). In particular, we’re making it so you can do this all from your editor more easily.
99.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
I'm one of the people building Cody ( https://cody.dev ), which you mentioned. Re: suboptimal, yeah, these are all very early and there is so much room for improvement. Do you have a sense at least of what would be less subop
100.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
We were first. No, we don’t anticipate any issues.
101.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Yeah, and we aren’t charging companies for our Apache 2 code. We have some open source (Apache 2) code, and some non-open-source code.
102.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
I am referring to Apache 2 here. We license a subset of stuff (a smaller subset after this change, but still all of client/cody*) as Apache 2.
103.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Also, I appreciate all the comments here and find them fair and thoughtful, including the critical stuff. You can join our Discord at https://discord.gg/rDPqBejz93 to chat more after this goes off the HN frontpage. And if a
104.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. Sourcegraph is now 2 separate products: code search and Cody (our code AI). Cody remains open source (Apache 2) in the client/cody* directories in the repository, and we're extracting that to a separate 100%
105.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
I understand where the author is coming from and respect their contributions to Commonmark. But... There are tons of markup languages for prose that have well-defined specs. So, why did Markdown win? IMO, because it does not have a well-d
106.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Congratulations to folks at MosaicML and Databricks!
107.
▲
by
sqs
3y ago
Anthropic's Claude is on par with or better than GPT-4 for many tasks. It's not self-hosted, but it is competitive with OpenAI's best model.
108.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Same here. My wife was on a citizens' traffic commission that approved some roundabouts there a while back, and I was hoping I could show her some interesting stuff.
109.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Yes, very happy with my Thelio desktop (AMD Ryzen). Quiet, fast, just works.
110.
▲
My mental model for building and using LLM-based applications
(about.sourcegraph.com)
2 points
by
sqs
4y ago
|
0 comments
111.
▲
Demoing an LLM-Based Application
(slack.org)
1 points
by
sqs
4y ago
|
0 comments
112.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Working on that now.
113.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Sourcegraph founder here. We just started shipping Cody, which answers code questions and writes code for you by reading your entire codebase and the code graph. It's often magical, often frustratingly wrong...but is getting better qui
114.
▲
Cody answers questions and writes code for you by reading the code graph
(about.sourcegraph.com)
5 points
by
sqs
4y ago
|
1 comments
115.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
"GitHub Copilot X is currently a representation of GitHub’s vision for the future rather than an available product offering of GitHub Copilot. As we continue to design, test, and build features that fall into the GitHub Copilot X visio
116.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
From https://github.com/features/preview/copilot-x (FAQ: When will GitHub Copilot X be available and how much does it cost?)
117.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
The burden is on those products to compel you, not you to break a force of habit. :) Code search historically has been adopted by <10% of devs, although it's usually binary within each company, with equilibriums at both ~1% adoption
118.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Court cases have been widely covered in all kinds of media for centuries. They are matters of public concern.
119.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Why is it deeply offensive? "Participate" here just means to follow, kind of like a Steve Jobs keynote liveblog. "Rooting" for one side of a legal case is absolutely appropriate for a defendant (or plaintiff) in our adve
120.
▲
by
sqs
4y ago
Yeah, I feel this. I recently added a .tool-versions file to a website repository (that non-programmers need to edit) and updated the README to say "install asdf ( https://asdf-vm.com/ ) and then run `pnpm install`"
More ›