4 ms·
Sourcegraph CEO here. It’s not $99/user/month anymore. It’s great that a lot of companies were willing to pay that, but we and our customers prefer a lower per-
by sqs 2y ago
Sourcegraph CEO here. It’s not $99/user/month anymore. It’s great that a lot of companies were willing to pay that, but we and our customers prefer a lower per-user price and a higher % of devs at the company using it (ideally 100%). We reduced prices for our customers (current and future). You can see the posted pricing at https://sourcegraph.com/pricing https://sourcegraph.com/pricing.
For any other dev tools companies, I’d strongly recommend having lower prices so that every dev at your customer can use it (if that’s relevant for your product). If you start seeing customers be really picky with who gets a license, it’s probably priced too high.
- CamelCaseName 2y agoOff-topic, but I see you always responding very quickly whenever Sourcegraph is mentioned. I was entertained a while back when I saw you getting accused for using sockpuppets, but am I correct in thinking that you're probably just using the API to monitor for name mentions? Edit: To be clear, I think this is great and that more companies should do this.
- ftigis 2y agoWhy does it say 1 user limit for Pro plan and also that is for small teams? Or am I missing misunderstand the pricing page?
- sqs 2y agoTeams (that don't need Cody Enterprise) should just buy Cody Pro for each dev individually for now. We will have shared billing soon.