spoiler

52 ms·

691.
by spoiler 5y ago
This makes sense about moving your active attention to different object(ive)s. I think I slowly stopped doing "active" multitasking and switched to this low-attention multi-tasking once my burn-out got worse. FWIW: I don't th
692.
by spoiler 5y ago
I'm vastly oversimplifying the issue (also I'm not a doctor), but didn't studies show that this type of multitasking is bad for our mental health and increases the likelihood of burnout?
693.
by spoiler 5y ago
They are weaponised already unfortunately. There are HN stories of competitors reporting devs/apps and them getting irrevocably banned without a platform to complain on/to. I used to like/defend Google, but they keep disappoi
694.
by spoiler 5y ago
I would say that's true for networking.k8s.io/v1beta1 Ingress, but not for networking.k8s.io/v1 which is much better. There's still some issues around "concerns" maybe eg: Should the Ingress also handle redirec
695.
by spoiler 5y ago
Not OP, but a few things come to mind: 1) Possibly to decrease coats of living? 2) Location might not have much better to offer? (Dunno how likely?) 3) Social situation (family, friends, niche industry?)
696.
by spoiler 5y ago
So does Deno: https://deno.land/manual/linking_to_external_code/integrity_... It's not part of a package manager, because there isn't one, though.
697.
by spoiler 5y ago
Ah, a competitor on one of my previous jobs (large European web hosting provider) did that. That was one of the reasons a lot of theirs customers came to us, becaus they couldn't do business with Russian clients. I think we had better
698.
by spoiler 5y ago
That's not the case in British English, where "the third of January" is preferred.
699.
by spoiler 5y ago
I'm gay, and I'm definitely attracted to some of your counterexamples, apart from the Adam's apple size; I don't care for those.
700.
by spoiler 5y ago
I use it for this as well. P.S: I'm not one to write "me too" comments, but there's no upvote count visibility for users. And since a designer working at 1p has eyes on the thread, it might make sense to add "me too
701.
by spoiler 5y ago
Ooh the selectively disabled extension is really cool! Thanks! I sometimes—rarely happens thought—dislike how the cursor renders on top of ligatures in vscode. Always wished it would allow me to "inject" the cursor into the ligatu
702.
by spoiler 5y ago
I second all that you said, even about RTFM struggles. I'd like to expand on RTFM, thought: for me it really depends on how it's structured. If it's a very "formal" or dry docs, I have problems absorbing them, but i
703.
by spoiler 5y ago
I'm not that knowledgeable on SEO, but thought that this can be controlled with the `link rel=canonical` and redirecting. https://developers.google.com/search/docs/advanced/crawling/...
704.
by spoiler 5y ago
I've not looked at the implementation, so I can't answer the first question, but to answer your second point/question: yes! I think getting across intent is very important for the other people reading your code. I guess her
705.
by spoiler 5y ago
What use case is that? FWIW, the docs are already generated programmatically in the first place, so you could access them with a similar approach (not sure how difficult that is, so maybe it's unrealistic advice). Also there's a t
706.
by spoiler 5y ago
I guess it comes down to taste and preference, but I much prefer cargo doc to go doc. Go doc has a "brutalist/minumalist" approach (I understand some people prefer that), while cargo doc has a more "humanist" approa
707.
by spoiler 5y ago
I see how you jumped to that conclusion, but I think you're conflating two things. First, back then it was sadly very common for children to be considered sexuality mature (age of consent in some European countries is still 13). That&#
708.
by spoiler 5y ago
I'm surprised at how many people here seem to take this personally. A few comments who were."against" this notion made some good points, just to taint the argument with their own insecurities about gender. Everyone needs to u
709.
by spoiler 5y ago
> I think maybe you're paying too much heed to what you see in concentrated and very self selecting online communities. That's a good point. In the domain specific communities, I've not not really seen language flamingo.
710.
by spoiler 5y ago
But isn't maintaining codegen more effort (and brittle) than just maintaining a generic implementation? Maye it's a matter of taste, though.
711.
by spoiler 5y ago
I admit that I did over-generalise with those two statements. There's different tradeoffs one needs to do in any language regarding performance/maintenance/effort. But for C++ there is little effort to bridge those gaps, or a
712.
by spoiler 5y ago
> I think the person you are characterising is quite rare. You could be right... I hope you are right, but I'm afraid you're not... > I'm not sure about that. I've spent 18 years programming in C++, for much of t
713.
by spoiler 5y ago
> Also, if a programmer is spending time "iterating" on a performance problem, he's already underperforming. That's okay for less experienced developers as part of the learning process, but expecting it to be the norm
714.
by spoiler 5y ago
> Obviously your experience doesn't involve budgeting or hiring developers. Ah, that is very true! :) I forgot to make clear in my comment that I wasn't referring to that bit at all. I only participated in the hiring/inter
715.
by spoiler 5y ago
> But as the market exists right now, Rust developers are twice as expensive and the product they deliver is twice as bad. It's interesting how we have different experiences regarding this. In my experience, it's usually the op
716.
by spoiler 5y ago
Some of these aren't true anymore. I'd say some things improved from that document. But, I'd also say a lot of things got worse that aren't mentioned. We could nitpick at specific sentences/questions, but at the end
717.
by spoiler 5y ago
I don't think anyone hates C++, they hate how it makes them feel when they have to work in it. Also, I think it's a bit ludicrous to say "just use a subset" because there's no definitive guide to "sane" or
718.
by spoiler 5y ago
If you're going to try to be clever/snide, at least come up with a better analogy... Using Linux effectively doesn't mean you need to learn its source code. You need to know about its features (and trade-off, etc). You don&
719.
by spoiler 5y ago
This idea reminds me of the Go+ language ( https://goplus.org/ ), which is kind of what you're proposing. But instead of reducing the language, they just "added less"! I think they were inspired by C++, but dec
720.
by spoiler 5y ago
It stands for "Undefined Behaviour" It's commonly used in C/C++ communities (elsewhere too, but not as often).

More ›