spicyj

20 ms·

151.
by spicyj 10y ago
Definitely. We have 30,000 React components at Facebook so we're not planning large breaking changes.
152.
by spicyj 10y ago
Yes, these are our existing unit tests (which are fairly comprehensive) running against our new implementation. Once we reach parity in tests we'll be close to release.
153.
React 15.4(facebook.github.io)
173 points by spicyj 10y ago|72 comments
154.
by spicyj 10y ago
Well, it is funny even if true. I searched quickly and found a page that claimed there were 15 blue moons in 20 years so I wasn't sure.
155.
by spicyj 10y ago
I figure someone at Google thought it was funny to say that blue moons occur approximately every 1 / (1.16699016 × 10-8 hertz) = 992 days. http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1%2F(1.16699016+%C3%97+...
156.
by spicyj 10y ago
To be fair, we do use a Twitter account called @reactjs and had two conferences called React.js Conf. So… yes, but it feels like a losing battle.
157.
by spicyj 10y ago
Sorry -- have we done something to offend you?
158.
by spicyj 10y ago
React is actively maintained and doesn't have any known security vulnerabilities.
159.
by spicyj 10y ago
The latter – and it is likely that we will change this API in the future and update the devtools to match. No guarantee that your monkeypatch will continue to be possible, especially as we rewrite large parts of the internals ( https:/
160.
by spicyj 10y ago
Please know this is not supported.
161.
by spicyj 10y ago
Please open an issue with more details about the changes you'd like and tag me in it.
162.
by spicyj 10y ago
Yes, this is often-requested. We don't necessarily need to change JSX to add this to React though. With our current implementation it's a pain to support it but we're working on it.
163.
by spicyj 10y ago
Google almost certainly receives many thousands of applications for the position. It sounds like this particular "prescreen" may be badly designed, but after a prescreen you'd certainly expect to talk to more technically-lite
164.
by spicyj 10y ago
Can you say what changes would be required in React for this to work? I assume that you are asking for parent components to be on the stack when child components render, but that is simply not how React works – you return a description of w
165.
by spicyj 10y ago
I don't know much Clojure, but it sounds like this is exactly the use case that context is meant for. If you were to use dynamic scope, how would the variables be restored if one of the descendants updated via setState? It doesn't
166.
by spicyj 10y ago
You can actually use any TOTP app with Facebook already, though the setting is very buried: https://www.facebook.com/help/358336074294704
167.
by spicyj 10y ago
Yes, you're generally correct. If you can call into ReactDOM.unstable_batchedUpdates at the top of the stack, that's another approach. We might be able to make that the default in the future so synchronous calls are always grouped
168.
by spicyj 10y ago
1. If a component changes state and its parent doesn't, then the other children aren't considered so it would be O(1). If the parent rerenders, then yes, we would consider each child and it would take O(n). 2. Yes, it would. You w
169.
by spicyj 10y ago
"Workplace" accounts are completely separate, with the exception of an optional link to your personal account to make it easier to log in. To my knowledge, no other data is shared. Your employer owns the data, not Facebook. See h
170.
by spicyj 10y ago
la-TEEN-ex seems to be the recommended convention.
171.
by spicyj 10y ago
Sorry, we don't have hundreds of thousands of dollars to spend on shirts to give away. People often ask if they can buy a shirt so we thought we'd do something fun here – you certainly don't need to get one. I'm sorry th
172.
by spicyj 10y ago
I'm not super rigid with all keys but I do seem to have "R with index finger" ingrained. R with the middle finger does work nicely in this case if I think about it and force myself to do it.
173.
by spicyj 10y ago
rg is harder to type with one hand because it uses the same finger twice. :)
174.
by spicyj 10y ago
No, that's not why they built it (they built it before starting their business) and I don't believe it's why they maintain it.
175.
by spicyj 10y ago
It's always been Michael and Ryan's project. They wanted to move it back out -- I assume to help promote their training business -- and that seems perfectly fair to me.
176.
by spicyj 10y ago
If it's a subgroup of https://www.facebook.com/groups/groupsatwaterloo/ then it would require an @uwaterloo.ca email to join the group.
177.
by spicyj 10y ago
Git explicitly shows a "Committer" line when typing the commit message if it chooses a default, so I also find not setting one globally and getting this reminder to be more useful: # Please enter the commit message for your ch
178.
by spicyj 10y ago
If you like React but want to avoid a build system, you can always do var form = React.createFactory('form'); form({...}, ...); or var e = React.createElement; e('form', {...}, ...);
179.
by spicyj 10y ago
Oh, that's funny. I was thinking it was. I guess it's a software company but not an internet company.
180.
by spicyj 10y ago
There's nothing that requires it to have content, no. Absent other styles, an empty <span> would be invisible and have no effect though.

More ›