spadez

18 ms·

31.
by spadez 5y ago
Have yet to see an explanation of https://austingwalters.com/covid19-vaccine-risks/ >What is clear, deaths associated with R00-R94 codes are 25,800 above the norm since February.
32.
by spadez 5y ago
People create brand new accounts when they want to say things that could cost them Karma.
33.
by spadez 5y ago
Sure, that is what I meant, they are required by law to show the benefit of the drug once. So its really upto them if they want to do another trial, right? At least as per current law..
34.
by spadez 5y ago
> Why would the companies producing the vaccine have a say in this.. Because, if I am not mistaken, these studies are funded by the companies themselves.
35.
by spadez 5y ago
I am not sure, may be it might show the Moderna vaccines are just as ineffective (against the variants circulating now). I am not sure anyone would want that, particularly things like these are cropping up https://austingwalters.
36.
by spadez 5y ago
> Thankfully it is big enough as the efficacy numbers have proven very accurate in real world measurements. But are you considering the fact that breakthrough infections are counted using comparitively low CT values in RT-PCR tests? Do w
37.
by spadez 5y ago
Quoting Dr. Malone "The alarming thing is that there is no alarm." This is long, and parts of it might be debatable, but I think this should be considered. It might be misguided in parts, but I think it is very genuine, and just a
38.
by spadez 5y ago
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27513568
39.
by spadez 5y ago
Making asserting statements when you don't have any evidence for such assertion is also BS, which sadly adds up to the already existing BS on the internet. So why not stop adding to it.
40.
by spadez 5y ago
I don't want popular HN stories. I want stories/comments that 1. Repeatedly gets submitted (titles could be different, which makes it tricky), but never make to front page. 2. Stories that drop faster than most of the stories that
41.
Negative consequences of failing to communicate uncertainties during a pandemic(medrxiv.org)
1 points by spadez 5y ago|0 comments
42.
by spadez 5y ago
Ok, so your opinion is that the PDF might be outdated. Makes much more sense than your original reply to be honest..
43.
by spadez 5y ago
>4500 deaths were reported in VAERS as potentially having any sort of a connection: This number is useless without also stating the estimated percentage of the actual adverse events are actually reported. It would be great if authors suc
44.
by spadez 5y ago
>"The Reportable Events Table (RET) reflects what is reportable by law" >Where does it say that? I've never seen it. https://www.fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availabi... >In the curre
45.
by spadez 5y ago
>To get on this list the vaccines need to have proven risks Please provide citation for this claim.
46.
by spadez 5y ago
>You're pointing towards this list as if it's some oracle for vaccine safety. Its not. Quite frankly, that is not the case. In almost all communication that try to promote covid vaccines, they include a statement that amounts t
47.
by spadez 5y ago
>They haven't deemed the new COVID vaccines risky enough Sounds like circular reasoning to me. They have't deemed the new COVID vaccines risky, because they don't have the data from population wide use. And they don't
48.
by spadez 5y ago
Does not make sense to me. It might not have the "same" risks, but it could have entirely different risks, which we don't know. So does not make sense to exclude them (in law) from being reported.
49.
by spadez 5y ago
> Get vaccinated. Can you give me a good reason why Covid vaccines are not included here in "The Reportable Events Table (RET) reflects what is reportable by law" https://vaers.hhs.gov/docs/VAERS_Table_of_R
50.
by spadez 5y ago
>If an intervention is shown to be effective in treating COVID-19, the design allows the replacement of the placebo group with the effective intervention. Is't that kind of bad? Say, if by pure chance, there is an intervention that
51.
by spadez 5y ago
Also asked about this here, but didn't get a lot of responses https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27495352
52.
Ask HN: Why are Covid vaccines not included in 'VAERS' reportable list [pdf](vaers.hhs.gov)
1 points by spadez 5y ago|0 comments
53.
by spadez 5y ago
> rebuttal is going to be "but I watched this video..." Not really, you can read the rebuttal from FLCCC here This is a response to the NIH/WHO judgement from FLCCC Alliance. I think it should be considered as well. https
54.
by spadez 5y ago
This is a response to the NIH/WHO judgement from FLCCC Alliance. I think it should be considered as well. https://covid19criticalcare.com/videos-and-press/flccc-relea... https://covid19criticalcare.com&
55.
by spadez 5y ago
>By postmortem molecular mapping, we found viral RNA in nearly all organs examined. In the video you shared, they talk about the ADE, basically allowing the virus to go to places it wouldn't otherwise be able to. Not sure if this is
56.
by spadez 5y ago
Some time back I came across these articles.. https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2020/11/27/will-an-rna-vaccine... https://sciencewithdrdoug.com/2021/02/15/breaking-study-shed... I
57.
by spadez 5y ago
This could be relevant https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/2021/06/03/covid19-the-spike-p...
58.
by spadez 5y ago
What friendship?
59.
by spadez 5y ago
>the claim is that there is no natural process that will result in the double argenine sequence. I think the claim is that it is very unlikely to happen naturally, and the article makes it very clear. So I wonder why you assume that it c
60.
by spadez 6y ago
If you buy the theory that Microsoft now loves opensource and Linux, I want to ask you why they don't provide full support for things like 'Wine'. May be even develop something like that themselves, that will allow people run

More ›