Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
spacetimeuser5
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
8 ms
·
31.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>Say it with me, "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof." Let's be honest with it. So someone is experiencing the self-transforming machine elves. Please provide the exact description of neuronal circuitry (
32.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>People totally blind from birth taking hallucinogens don't see entities So these people do not trip at all on hallucinogens? Sounds like rather improbable. ~70% of what you call "visual experience" is driven by non-v
33.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>By striving to cleave the drug’s effects from the context in which it’s given—to a patient by a therapist, both of whom are hoping for healing—blinded studies may fail to capture the full picture. The amount of monkey types amongst
34.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Would you think that saving ~5K on property sale taxes in 2 years is not worth it if not saving and selling now would upgrade their tools/workspace?
35.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
I was listening to Science of Everything podcast by James Fodor (probably) on podbean.com for a 6 part "How computers work". He sort of is studying for a PhD or something, and he mentioned (in the 2nd part) that the uncertainty pr
36.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
I'd focus on coins only. There was a link on HN about some pilot study by some students, where they tried to emulate or used an actual mechanical hand or something similar flipping coins. How? (though not in my protocol) For example, a
37.
▲
Ask HN: Books etc. about Heisenberg uncertainty principle in CS, software?
3 points
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
|
4 comments
38.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Consider the law of induction, according to which the fact that monkeys flipped coins for gozzilions of years with an average probability 0.5 doesn't mean they'd flip it with the same probability tomorrow.
39.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
ok, won't read neither write it then.
40.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Suppose the protocol exists. It's not "gambling cheating" at all, it's not even "gambling", rather following some general methodological guidelines from quantum mechanics (least but not last). The question is t
41.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
This has already been developed. The goal is to land a coin on the edge with more than 1/6000 probability.
42.
▲
Ask HN: Whould you replicate a protocol of landing a coin on the edge?
1 points
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
|
9 comments
43.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
These MRI machines generate a rather strong magnetic field 3-5 T. Even if it is a minimal 0.5 T, natural Earth's magnetic field is much smaller ~5 × 10^(-5) T. Thus for ecological validity they should have checked that MRI MF really do
44.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>This network, whose activity is spread throughout the frontal and parietal lobes of the brain, A (rare enough) person in chronic coma, regaining consciousness on a sedative-hypnotic drug zolpidem, which lasts for a couple of hours a
45.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Sinclair is now using epigenetic regprogramming with OSK (developmental) genes to effectively regrow the severed optic nerve in primates and proceeding to humans. Levin has mouse paws cut off in a similar way and regrows them in a wearable
46.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Yes, biology is not as simple. With mTOR inhibition fasting is not a full story. mTOR is a sensor of food (amino acids) and a master regulator of growth signals. mTOR is inhibited naturally by fasting and artificially by drugs like rapamyci
47.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
If Levin wouldn't produce so much fluff on pseudoscientific concepts like "selves" and "computational psychiatry", he would have had the mice regenerate better and already proceed to humans, like Sinclair. How woul
48.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>Every computing system, biological or synthetic, from cells to brains to laptops, has a cost. Obviously so, fetching tiny potatoes from point A to point B by monkeys has a cost.
49.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
These data do not have a control group of healthy similar tissue samples, thus are not falsifiable, and are not 100% scientifically valid.
50.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Try using the protocols and doses from the original article.
51.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
The cheap monkey headset works in a similar way: monkeys just essentially continue to analyze trajectories of medieval cannon balls in the LHC and to count potatoes in the form of bytes.
52.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>> The sample was immersed in preservatives and stained with heavy metals to make the cells easier to see. Try experimenting with immersing your brain in preservatives and staining with heavy metals to see how would you be able to wri
53.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Yea, and at the Plank's scale resolution as a logical extension of the nanoscale with their "modern" measurement methodology this cheap monkey headset just disintegrates, haha.
54.
▲
Non-Coding RNA
(en.wikipedia.org)
1 points
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
|
0 comments
55.
▲
Ask HN: What do you think about A.Rachlef's opinion on great startups?
5 points
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
|
6 comments
56.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Here you are, monkeys. Get now more of your cheap headset.
57.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
Ok. And how many professors of medicine and doctors die under 120. Monkeys got really cheap headset.
58.
▲
by
spacetimeuser5
2y ago
>>realizing my brain no longer works. So is it really you realizing your brain no longer works, or part of the brain with ownership of the rest realizing its brain no longer works? P>S> To get still a full spectrum, let's n
59.
▲
Ask HN: How to access files in /tmp in a HF space (GUI)?
2 points
by
spacetimeuser5
3y ago
|
1 comments
60.
▲
Ask HN: How to delete a cofounder match from the list of accepted invitations?
2 points
by
spacetimeuser5
3y ago
|
1 comments
More ›