sophistroll

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   This article presupposes that large numbers of lawyers should have an easy time finding work.
2. 2.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   Seems backwards. Why are we justifying the cruelty that results from a mindset necessary to witness cruelty? Perhaps the workers won't strike; let's ask the animals.
3. 3.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   He is not describing good people. Good people can reason that hurting others is not how to improve mood.
4. 4.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   I am doing this. It is difficult. And it makes restaurants suck. And let's be real, SF, Portland, etc might one day reach 50% humane meat... maybe. What's the plan for telling the "average" American that a dozen eggs cost $12? And some
5. 5.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   Ridiculous. Are you implying I have the same legislative power as the agriculture lobbies?
6. 6.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   Sounds more like you are defending hypocrites/unprincipled people. By your argument, it's more ok for me to hurt you (from whom I am distanced by the fact that we have never met) than my girlfriend. It's a question of rights, not convenien
7. 7.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   For many, the concept "boycott meat" is even more ridiculous than the concept "animal rights". We have a very long way to go.
8. 8.▲
   by sophistroll 13y ago

   I don't think text files should have the same rights as animals. Yet.
9. 9.▲
   by sophistroll 14y ago

   Surprising that nobody has mentioned this, but Vim is free and Sublime is not.