sooheon

143 ms·

811.
by sooheon 8y ago
Lenovo makes $45b a year, so the fine is maybe an hour and a half of revenue.
812.
by sooheon 8y ago
The immediate jump to assuming outrage and FUD in others strange. I associate Alphabet as ~= Google and I am not outraged that they're researching this topic. Why the overeager apologia?
813.
by sooheon 8y ago
The project readme warns it's broken on recent macos versions.
814.
by sooheon 8y ago
> But the other is almost a, "if you're reading this, we assume you already read between the lines on what people are doing with poppy seeds." Why do you have a problem with that stance? The very second sentence mentions
815.
by sooheon 8y ago
You won't send machines to die, you send them to kill other humans.
816.
by sooheon 8y ago
Were the lights off as well?
817.
by sooheon 8y ago
Those just seem to be more rarified forms of pleasure for experts. It's like forgoing the gatorade to savor crystal clear water after a run, or something.
818.
by sooheon 8y ago
Sacrifice more for greater fame and success. People will still make the distinction that they are even greater for having done so, like you are now.
819.
by sooheon 8y ago
I don't think it's a generous analogy, but it's poking fun at being test DRIVEN, rather than driver driven. I think he'd agree with you that it's the thinking and navigating and "actually caring about what they
820.
by sooheon 8y ago
> If it makes money, then who really cares! If it makes money now, you might care about continuing to make money in the future. Being able to reason about and change your product should help with that, but so will more money to throw at
821.
by sooheon 8y ago
Rich Hickey called it guard rail driven programming. You'll never drive where you want to go if you just get on the highway and bump off the guard rails.
822.
by sooheon 8y ago
I love comments like this where your reaction to it flip flops between reverence and revulsion like an optical illusion.
823.
by sooheon 8y ago
If this is hosting front-end files for me, and is "serverless", how do I hook up my db, or deal with the filesystem, etc.? Or is this only for static sites?
824.
by sooheon 8y ago
I agree pre-determination is orthogonal to the question. If the state machine has a truly random component, pre-determination goes out the window. > [...] if we remove the prior state modifier from the generate state function then the co
825.
by sooheon 8y ago
I think we're in agreement, except that I believe that whatever capacity you have for choice is also stored as state. What you call state and choice, I might call state and procedures. Both are stored in the substrate of the brain as s
826.
by sooheon 8y ago
I love your framing of the question, but am frustrated with the Compatibilist conclusion. "Moral responsibility" is a heuristic for our monkey brains, tapping into evolved ideas of justice, accounting for imperfect prediction of f
827.
by sooheon 8y ago
> You are, at your basest existence, the ability to choose. A choice engine with a physical layer; a physical memory, physical emotion, the ability to think. But at your foundation, you choose. I don't see how this is at odds with t
828.
by sooheon 8y ago
They suit the common misreading if the very next four lines don't exist. Which is why it's a misreading--it's like ignoring every word after "however," in a sentence. Though as for that the passing there / Had
829.
by sooheon 8y ago
Write what you know.
830.
by sooheon 8y ago
I am still free to make fun of people for their senseless interpretations, however nice it makes them feel.
831.
by sooheon 8y ago
Case in point: people pay for health services.
832.
by sooheon 8y ago
You for a cross continental trip you lose days of your life confined to the interior of your car. I'd rather suck it up for a few hours and kick my feet up at the destination.
833.
by sooheon 8y ago
https://spandan-madan.github.io/DeepLearningProject/PyTorch_...
834.
by sooheon 8y ago
> The incentive is not directional The magnitude matters. Meaning journalists have an incentive to stretch the truth in either direction, as long as it'll get a reaction. A journalist now has to weigh this monetary incentive against
835.
by sooheon 8y ago
Looks like a similar pattern and the author is the same as with this "Big Hack". But I don't see any hard evidence to say that Bloomberg is completely wrong, either. Just that NSA etc. have officially denied it (which you ass
836.
by sooheon 8y ago
Reading between the lines, Fitzpatrick's claim is that other primary sources could be fictitious, and the writer fabricated them based on interviews with him.
837.
by sooheon 8y ago
> One could project n-dimensional spaces to any arbitrary lower dimension with the right semantic and spatial distances. I'm incredulous. Doing this well for unstructured text would be worth a lot in many industries today, let alone
838.
by sooheon 8y ago
Your claim and your supporting argument do not align. Fruitarianism can have been preached about for thousands of years and also be the diet associated with Steve Jobs.
839.
by sooheon 8y ago
Damn, this thread is full of actual good analogies today! Thanks for this one :)
840.
by sooheon 8y ago
"No matter what I eat, i'll be fat. But no matter what ngngngng eats, he stays skinny!" This is plain denial, and is not the view expressed in the article. Anyone who reads and understands the article, and the purported benef

More ›