> But the other is almost a, "if you're reading this, we assume you already read between the lines on what people are doing with poppy seeds." Why do you have

> But the other is almost a, "if you're reading this, we assume you already read between the lines on what people are doing with poppy seeds." Why do you have a problem with that stance? The very second sentence mentions that opiates can be found on seeds. Plenty of harm reduction and education groups take the stance of being clear about consequences and dangers without going into detail about exactly how to brew a batch.