Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
someguyiguess
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
3 ms
·
1.
▲
by
someguyiguess
12d ago
The bus factor makes no sense to you? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bus_factor
2.
▲
by
someguyiguess
13d ago
Printing money doesn’t create value. It dilutes value.
3.
▲
by
someguyiguess
13d ago
This reminds me of the “it’s not a pyramid scheme. It’s a reverse funnel system”
4.
▲
by
someguyiguess
13d ago
Zoom back in
5.
▲
by
someguyiguess
13d ago
I think it’s safe to venture into science fiction futures at this point. We have AI and government mass surveillance technology. We’re living in science fiction futures.
6.
▲
by
someguyiguess
13d ago
When money is created, the total amount of money in circulation increases, decreasing the value of each unit of money overall. It’s called inflation.
7.
▲
by
someguyiguess
16d ago
Don’t talk to anyone. Internalize it and transmute it into something powerful instead.
8.
▲
by
someguyiguess
16d ago
I want to join but the Freemasons lack a presence in my city.
9.
▲
by
someguyiguess
16d ago
Therapists aren’t great at it either.
10.
▲
by
someguyiguess
17d ago
Yep. Straight to the pie hole.
11.
▲
by
someguyiguess
17d ago
Private citizens filming in public and police forces setting up arrays of surveillance cameras in public somehow don’t seem equivalent. I’m not a lawyer so I can’t properly articulate what the legal difference is. And if there isn’t one the
12.
▲
by
someguyiguess
19d ago
I genuinely cannot tell if this was meant to be humorous.
13.
▲
by
someguyiguess
19d ago
It IS fraud. So report it and get your money back.
14.
▲
by
someguyiguess
22d ago
It's like they're begging for failure
15.
▲
by
someguyiguess
22d ago
Pretty sure a lot of people got fired over Microsoft Bob though
16.
▲
by
someguyiguess
22d ago
Occam's Razor takes precedence in this case. The conclusion that requires the fewest assumptions is most likely the correct one. It is far more likely that this is a case of the White House acting consistently with the way it has acted
17.
▲
by
someguyiguess
27d ago
Anyone who ever worked as a front end developer definitely felt this.
18.
▲
by
someguyiguess
27d ago
Robots would excel at writing that sort of copy I’d assume. (I haven’t tested it but doubt an LLM couldn’t handle that)
19.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
Based on the rest of your writing I’m going to assume that the prompt was the problem.
20.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
One of those things is true
21.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
4.6 was better in some way that I can’t put my finger on. None of the models since have been able to reproduce its quality of output for me.
22.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
That happens to me constantly with codex
23.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
Dump is a great word for it
24.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
It’s strange how you think AI is some static thing that only produces the type of output you experienced and isn’t constantly improving. My experience has proven the latter time and time again.
25.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
Is it though? What’s your source for that data?
26.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
75% chance you’re wrong.
27.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
Yeah that’s absolutely absurd. My experience has been the opposite. GPT can’t even seem to complete tags running more than an hour without freezing.
28.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
That should be illegal. Sounds like a very fraudulent business tactic.
29.
▲
by
someguyiguess
2mo ago
They’re a paid service now. It’s no longer open source.
30.
▲
by
someguyiguess
3mo ago
Why would you waste tokens on that? Just do a google search?
More ›