sndgndgndgndy

4 ms·

1.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
AIPAC is the single most influential special interest group in US politics. If you don't do what AIPAC says to advance their foreign policy goals, they will remove you from office at the next election. They do this on a regular basis
2.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
GPUs have a five year lifespan before they become obsolete and start experiencing reliability issues. We're already 1-2 years into that five year lifespan.
3.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
Science is a method of inquiry, not an institution or group of people with titles.
4.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
Provide evidence that they ever contained that phrase. You can't, because you made it up, because it didn't happen.
5.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
I originally linked to the thread with my first post referencing the 2014 discussion https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48900528 . I gave you that thread because it sticks out in my memory as the oldest, most egregious exa
6.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
I linked to a discussion thread linking to the other post. My point is that Hasbara has been active on HN for a long time and you're turning a blind eye to it. On other sites you will frequently see their sockpuppets posting the sa
7.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
That phrase never appears in the site guidelines. Try again.
8.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
I'm not asking for a multi-paragraph in-depth reply: I want you answer how these two posts that I linked to from 2014 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8406178 and https://news.ycombinator.com/item?i
9.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
Dang, I would appreciate a reply, since you kind of skirted around my main point, which is that pro-Israel accounts have been posting copy-pasted verbatim-identical talking points going back all the way to at least 2014. Multiple accounts
10.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
Why would multiple accounts make the same very specific "Please no simplified propaganda on HN" quip if they weren't collaborating somehow? How could multiple accounts arrive at that same exact phrasing if they weren't
11.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
Making a fresh child reply in case that helps visibility. Please see this linked example from 2014: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8406178
12.
by sndgndgndgndy 2mo ago
The particularly egregious instance I'm thinking of from back in 2013 would link back to my doxxable info, so unfortunately you'll have to take my word for it. Disappointing, I know, but it's not worth leaking anything when
13.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
The only reason Israeli government influence operations persist on social media is because they manipulate and exploit site moderation to their advantage.
14.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
No, and if you ban me I'll make a new account on a fresh IP. I've seen IDF and Hasbara types posting literal copy-pasted verbatim-identical shill replies from multiple sockpuppet HN accounts, going all the way back to at least 20
15.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
The IDF/Hasbara has been active on HN for over a decade. Trying to write things off as conspiracy theories doesn't work when the site is under persistent social influence attack by a state actor.
16.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Not if you're Israel-First.
17.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Your data is for traffic accidents, not crimes. Public transit is dangerous because of crime.
18.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Assertions made without evidence can be disregarded without evidence, and your assertion does not match my personal experience. Public transit is dangerous, especially in cities like SF or Seattle.
19.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
That's cool and all, but this work of fiction is economically and thermodynamically impossible with how much energy the current models consume.
20.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
You don't think Jeffrey Epstein blackmailing US and UK celebrities and politicians on behalf of the Israeli government qualifies as a conspiracy? Or that Epstein was one of many similar influence assets operated by Israel? Hell, AIPA
21.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Wow, I guess governments of the whole western world just woke up one morning and decided to clamp down on the free exchange of information on the internet at the precise moment their citizenry was up in arms over Israel committing mass geno
22.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
If you so much as mention that this bill was passed to censor criticism of Israel, you will yourself be censored. Our politicians don't actually represent us.
23.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Stop trying to shut down discussions that you don't like.
24.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Someone who is 75 years old today was 49 years old at the peak of the dotcom craze, and is probably a lot more computer literate than you're giving them credit for. What you're saying might have been true 20 years ago, but it isn
25.
by sndgndgndgndy 3mo ago
Ah yes, Jeffrey Epstein was a, uh, "Colonialist". Working for the Colonialists to blackmail US celebrities and politicians. In the name of Colonialism.
26.
by sndgndgndgndy 4mo ago
It would be a massive scandal if any of our other allies were conducting this level of spying on our country's senior leadership, for the sole purpose of manipulating their decision processes to the foreign ally's benefit. Israel
27.
by sndgndgndgndy 4mo ago
Unpopular opinion: turning public universities into an academic hunger games is diametrically opposed to their purpose for existing, which is to create an educated populace. Intentionally lowering the quality of instruction, as well as del