3 ms·
The particularly egregious instance I'm thinking of from back in 2013 would link back to my doxxable info, so unfortunately you'll have to take my word for it.
by sndgndgndgndy 4mo ago
The particularly egregious instance I'm thinking of from back in 2013 would link back to my doxxable info, so unfortunately you'll have to take my word for it. Disappointing, I know, but it's not worth leaking anything when dealing with these vicious amoral scumbags. I do suggest at least familiarizing yourself with the scope of Hasbara's efforts on social media sites like and HN and reddit, however, as that is public information.
Edit: looks like I actually had the foresight to use a throwaway in 2014, so there's no doxxable info: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8406178 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8406178
@dang please see this
- sndgndgndgndy 4mo ago[flagged]
- Cider9986 4mo agoThey are just quoting the guidelines. Not bots :dismayed-face:
- sndgndgndgndy 4mo agoThat phrase never appears in the site guidelines. Try again.
- Cider9986 4mo agoThe site guidelines could.... change
- sndgndgndgndy 4mo agoProvide evidence that they ever contained that phrase. You can't, because you made it up, because it didn't happen.