Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
smorrow
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
9 ms
·
91.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
>> that doesn't automatically mean it's a bad thing. > Penal code begs to differ. It's well known on the Internet (at least) that legal and illegal aren't the definitions of good and bad. > Shattered self eva
92.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
> I find "balance-sheet" to be generally nicer to read than "balanceSheet" Me too, and I've wondered if it's because it's activating the same part of my brain that gets aggravated when people decide to
93.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
No. Someone may well work out perfectly logically that there's nothing more for them to do in life. And that's their choice. You're pathologising someone just for coming to a certain conclusion. Of course, people might als
94.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Pipe/heredoc to edbrowse will handle that, too.
95.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Research 9th and 10th had a /cs pretty much identical to Plan 9's /net. I doubt with any of that user-level control, though. IIRC Research's fmount(2) would've allowed people to run their own (unrestricted) copy o
96.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Maybe it's like grep. `grep asterisk` is different from `cat asterisk |grep`, in that it knows which file it's in and which line number of that file the match is on.
97.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Double click, type "20", double click, type "15", double click, type "10", double click, type "35". (All without typing the actual quotemarks.) If I had realised earlier that it's (x,y) to
98.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I would guess that natural differences between individuals in thinking style would heavily outweigh any differences caused by wearing a suit or not.
99.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
"Rude" things are 100% superficial, pretty much by definition of rude. (As soon as something becomes an issue in terms of actual consequences, we stop using the word "rude" and starting saying other things: unacceptable,
100.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Well. To move the body to which your genitals are attached.
101.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Any sensible code is going to have to do that stuff whether the machine's endianness matches IP's or not, though. It happens on BE boxes too. It's either that or write completely different code for different CPUs.
102.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Actually... I can't think of a better word for people who envangelise Plan 9 on comment sites but never actually use it themselves.
103.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
It's the same C code doing IP, going through the same steps and the same number of steps, whether the underlying machine is little- or big-endian. So if you're saying about wasted cycles...
104.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I'd like it better if it was more like csvkit, with a separate jqgrep, jqfmt, jqsort... that you combine using the shell. Because of course everybody already knows the shell.
105.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
They don't seem any different from any other deformed baby pics.
106.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I take it you're predominantly inattentive (you omit the letter H). I see on the ADHD web sites they always advocate exercise, and I dismiss it out of hand every time as something I don't think would apply to me. I tend to think o
107.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
"do more boys have ADHD than girls" It's a fact that more boys than girls are diagnosed, but I've noticed that /r/adhd seems overwhelmingly female. I dunno, though, maybe it's just that people are more li
108.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
"They don't even know that you can single click." I see alot of younger people are like this about some things. (but not single-clicking obviously.) How about raking your scrollwheel through fifteen pages to get somewhere? An
109.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
If we're being objective, I think we can agree that having multiple buttons is more basic and more self-evident knowledge than being able to click a button in multiple ways.
110.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
?
111.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
I was using that Google 3D plot viewer thing the other day and assumed right-click-dragging would do something for me. It didn't, and it occurred to me that the reason we have this is that Microsoft, Apple, or some other microcomputer
112.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
> swearing Most actual instances of the actual word "fuck" aren't even swears.
113.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
The smaller they are, the less hard they fall. Also: I knew there were goose barnacles; never heard of barnacle geese before, though.
114.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
" I think a much better way to start is to remove gender, race, etc. from college and work applications altogether. " There's such a thing as interviews, though.
115.
▲
by
smorrow
11y ago
Probably a girls' school.
116.
▲
by
smorrow
12y ago
Mostly.
117.
▲
by
smorrow
12y ago
Sounds alright to me tbh.
118.
▲
by
smorrow
12y ago
creat was always create-and-open.
119.
▲
by
smorrow
12y ago
When sed was new, the name wouldn't even have been considered cryptic: everybody already new ed. Also: before sed there was gres. I'm not saying it's relevant, just that I've thought it would be better to have gres, and
120.
▲
by
smorrow
12y ago
"Gnu" is a real word in the dictionary. Edit: On my system it's the only ^.nu$ in the dictionary.
More ›