3 ms·

>> that doesn't automatically mean it's a bad thing. > Penal code begs to differ. It's well known on the Internet (at least) that legal and illegal aren't the

by smorrow 11y ago

>> that doesn't automatically mean it's a bad thing. > Penal code begs to differ. It's well known on the Internet (at least) that legal and illegal aren't the definitions of good and bad. > Shattered self evaluation, acute stress disorder, PTSD etc. Of course if you only ask people who found it bad enough that they had to talk to someone about it... > That's not how child abuse works. I thought we were talking about a horny male 14 year old. > The law doesn't care what you think. > Calling it rape when a male student does it, but not when a female teacher does it is definitely evidence of bias in reporting. Yes, for the reason that I said: > Everybody knows this on an instinctive level, which is why we let [women] away with it.

exo762 11y ago
Half of your post answers someone else points. >>> that doesn't automatically mean it's a bad thing. >> Penal code begs to differ. > It's well known on the Internet (at least) that legal and illegal aren't the definitions of good and bad. Its well known among lawyers that things that are in Penal Code are Bad as in "whole society think that such behavior is unacceptable and should be punished". This is the main defining characteristic that separates material in Penal Code from stuff in Civil Code. And since its HN, I assume that you know set theory and I don't have to explain what does follows and what does not. >> Shattered self evaluation, acute stress disorder, PTSD etc. > Of course if you only ask people who found it bad enough that they had to talk to someone about it... You know that some percentage of violent rape women victims actually reach orgasm? >> That's not how child abuse works. > I thought we were talking about a horny male 14 year old. So if I'll find a horny female 14 year old I can totally "sex her up"? You should probably read once again your posts. Your views on subject are already known, now why don't you think of potential social consequences of this fact.

by smorrow 11y ago

exo762 11y ago

Half of your post answers someone else points. >>> that doesn't automatically mean it's a bad thing. >> Penal code begs to differ. > It's well known on the Internet (at least) that legal and illegal aren't the definitions of good and bad. Its well known among lawyers that things that are in Penal Code are Bad as in "whole society think that such behavior is unacceptable and should be punished". This is the main defining characteristic that separates material in Penal Code from stuff in Civil Code. And since its HN, I assume that you know set theory and I don't have to explain what does follows and what does not. >> Shattered self evaluation, acute stress disorder, PTSD etc. > Of course if you only ask people who found it bad enough that they had to talk to someone about it... You know that some percentage of violent rape women victims actually reach orgasm? >> That's not how child abuse works. > I thought we were talking about a horny male 14 year old. So if I'll find a horny female 14 year old I can totally "sex her up"? You should probably read once again your posts. Your views on subject are already known, now why don't you think of potential social consequences of this fact.