Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
skjhn
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
7 ms
·
1.
▲
Pokémon GO, scaling profile services with Couchbase and NoSQL
(blog.couchbase.com)
10 points
by
skjhn
10y ago
|
0 comments
2.
▲
by
skjhn
10y ago
MongoDB returns inconsistent query results. Couchbase avoids this problem with skip lists and snapshots.
3.
▲
Concurrency Behavior: MongoDB vs. Couchbase
(blog.couchbase.com)
5 points
by
skjhn
10y ago
|
1 comments
4.
▲
by
skjhn
10y ago
Sort of. One of the requirements was replication. The databases had to replicate every document so that it was stored on two different nodes. This ensures availability. The only way to do that with MongoDB is to run secondary nodes too. Now
5.
▲
by
skjhn
10y ago
"Did they test against a single MongoDB server or cluster?" Couchbase: 9 nodes on 9 AWS instances (1 node per instance). MongoDB: 18 nodes on 9 AWS instances (1 primary and 1 secondary per instance). "Well if you pick a good
6.
▲
MongoDB fails to perform, runs out of gas
(blog.couchbase.com)
12 points
by
skjhn
10y ago
|
4 comments
7.
▲
by
skjhn
10y ago
At least you get SQL and JOINs with Couchbase.
8.
▲
by
skjhn
11y ago
There are a handful of databases that implement map-reduce one way or another - CouchDB, Couchbase, and MongoDB off the top of my head. Views might be a CouchDB/Couchbase concept, but not incremental map-reduce. In what way is JSON ine
9.
▲
by
skjhn
11y ago
I'm not sure about the format, but it's compressed.
10.
▲
by
skjhn
11y ago
Let's see if I can help here. A lot people like async map-reduce. If you need to perform aggregation on a lot of data, its constantly growing, and you need the results to be current, async map-reduce is great. In the best case scenario
11.
▲
Advanced Object Modeling for High Write Rates – Part 1
(blog.couchbase.com)
2 points
by
skjhn
11y ago
|
0 comments
12.
▲
by
skjhn
11y ago
TLDR - MongoDB is faster than any other NoSQL database in a benchmark published without any configuration. The results can't be reproduced let alone validated. However, in a benchmark published with all of the configuration and all of
13.
▲
MongoDB Is Special, Its Benchmark Proves It
(blog.couchbase.com)
11 points
by
skjhn
11y ago
|
3 comments
14.
▲
Leading NoSQL Database Vendors Couchbase, MongoDB, and DataStax Lock Horns
(blog.couchbase.com)
7 points
by
skjhn
11y ago
|
1 comments
15.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
Good catch. Fixed.
16.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
TLDR: MongoDB benchmarked Couchbase Server by having it perform CAS operations (read + update) while MongoDB performed basic operations (update), they used an outdated client library that is two years old, and they performed it with single
17.
▲
MongoDB Rules Single Node Deployments, Fails to Scale
(blog.couchbase.com)
42 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
29 comments
18.
▲
Announcing Multi-Dimensional Scaling
(blog.couchbase.com)
5 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
1 comments
19.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
It compares 9 nodes of Couchbase Server to 9 nodes of MongoDB. Couchbase Server reads and writes to every node, but MongoDB only reads and writes to primary nodes. That's the problem with active/passive topologies. MongoDB can rea
20.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
That may be true, but they both have document models and Couchbase Server will have a complete query language based on SQL, secondary indexes, and support for joins. http://docs.couchbase.com/developer/n1ql-dp4/n1q
21.
▲
How Wired Is MongoDB and WiredTiger?
(blog.couchbase.com)
10 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
5 comments
22.
▲
Will 2015 be the year of NoSQL?
(zdnet.com)
2 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
23.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
I think it's safe to say both mobile and IoT network access is anything but reliable. Not sure if is another solution besides an embedded database with automatic sync.
24.
▲
Web, Mobile and IoT distributed database requirements
(blog.couchbase.com)
4 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
1 comments
25.
▲
Open Source, Community, and NoSQL
(blog.couchbase.com)
2 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
26.
▲
I Interviewed the Ghost of MongoDB Scalability
(blog.couchbase.com)
16 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
27.
▲
Distributed Databases and Replication Design
(blog.couchbase.com)
1 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
28.
▲
Dissecting the NoSQL Benchmark
(blog.couchbase.com)
5 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
29.
▲
MongoDB and Apache Cassandra / DataStax, where art thou?
(blog.couchbase.com)
11 points
by
skjhn
12y ago
|
0 comments
30.
▲
by
skjhn
12y ago
Network roundtrip included. Regarding MongoDB, they are. They say MongoDB 2.8 will have document level locking. No durable configs in this benchmark though. All databases fsync'd after writes. The servers had SSDs.
More ›