3 ms·
How Wired Is MongoDB and WiredTiger?
- deleted 12y ago[deleted]
- arthursilva 12y agoBench-marketing aside, I guess nobody ever expected MongoDB to outperform Couchbase. It's strengths are elsewhere, like the query language, secondary indexes and document model.
- skjhn 12y agoThat may be true, but they both have document models and Couchbase Server will have a complete query language based on SQL, secondary indexes, and support for joins. http://docs.couchbase.com/developer/n1ql-dp4/n1ql-intro.html http://docs.couchbase.com/developer/n1ql-dp4/n1ql-intro.html http://query.pub.couchbase.com/tutorial/#1 http://query.pub.couchbase.com/tutorial/#1
- arthursilva 12y agoPrecisely, but as of today the document model is limited (at least in comparison to Mongo). I'm following these developments for a while and I agree that they'll be killer!
- alittletooraph 12y agoIs the report comparing 9 active couchbase nodes v 3 active mongodb nodes? Am I missing something here?
- skjhn 12y agoIt compares 9 nodes of Couchbase Server to 9 nodes of MongoDB. Couchbase Server reads and writes to every node, but MongoDB only reads and writes to primary nodes. That's the problem with active/passive topologies. MongoDB can read from secondary nodes but only if a) you don't require strong consistency or b) you don't mind degrading write performance - it would have to replicate to all secondaries nodes before the write finishes.