Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
skicoachapp
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
4 ms
·
1.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
Link for context: skicoach.app
2.
▲
Show HN: An offline-first ski analysis app
1 points
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
|
1 comments
3.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
Fair point. I meant “finished enough to be used,” not “done forever.” The question is whether even that threshold still matters.
4.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
That makes sense. It feels less like paying for coverage and more like paying for the machinery around it. Once that’s the case, it barely matters whether something is finished or not. What matters is whether there’s a budget and a push beh
5.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
Good reference. “The Submarine” assumes visibility can come later. What I’m unsure about today is whether later still exists — or if coordinated amplification is now the price of entry.
6.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
That’s a great framing “the intensity of indifference” really resonates. What I’m struggling with is less the idea that hustle is required and more the scale of it. When even a finished product requires a ream of paper, 10 variants, repeat
7.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
Agreed — and that’s exactly what I’m trying to understand. What surprised me wasn’t that PR matters, but that shipping a finished product seems to carry almost no signal by itself anymore. At that point it stops being about communication sk
8.
▲
Ask HN: Why do media react to coordinated launches but ignore finished products?
1 points
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
|
10 comments
9.
▲
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
That’s a good way to put it — distribution really does feel like a different craft. What I’m struggling with is that many products don’t have a “natural hangout” early on. Curious whether people here found one channel worth committing to, o
10.
▲
Ask HN: How do solid products get noticed once the launch hype is gone?
3 points
by
skicoachapp
8mo ago
|
2 comments
11.
▲
by
skicoachapp
9mo ago
I agree that this model has a lot going for it. What it does really well is set expectations upfront: you’re buying a version and a defined update window, not an open-ended promise. Where I think many products stumble is skipping that cla
12.
▲
by
skicoachapp
9mo ago
That example actually highlights something important: it’s not just a technical pricing choice, it’s a perception thing. When users feel like they were nudged into a subscription in a way that feels deceptive , that’s what really dents t
13.
▲
by
skicoachapp
9mo ago
That approach makes a lot of sense to me. Adding new value and asking people to pay for more feels fundamentally different from taking something away and asking them to pay to get it back. The moment users feel something was removed, the
14.
▲
by
skicoachapp
9mo ago
This matches my intuition almost exactly. Especially the distinction between: paying once to own a version vs paying for an ongoing service. I think a lot of conflict comes from companies blurring that line after users have already built
15.
▲
Ask HN: When does changing pricing models break user trust?
6 points
by
skicoachapp
9mo ago
|
11 comments
16.
▲
Show HN: The SkiBlackBox–100% offline AI ski coach, zero data leaves your phone
(theskiblackbox.com)
2 points
by
skicoachapp
10mo ago
|
0 comments