Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
skellington
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
6 ms
·
1.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
The weirdest thing about this to me is I was just thinking about the arbitrariness of current North being up the other day and then this article pops up here. They're reading our freaking brains!
2.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
It's not literal. It says directly in the article: "...defined the practice of politics as a struggle against an existential enemy, arguing that politics is just religion in disguise." and "human societies tend to spiral
3.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
I know you're just willfully dumb, but other people reading might think you actually have a point. No army in the world including the US could stop a civilian uprising of even a million people who have just rifles and the will to fight
4.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
Yeah but at least they're also destroying the soil to grow all that shit Monsanto roundup-ready corn/soy/alfalfa/etc. for no profit and as an added bonus they get to kill all those pesky insects and bees!
5.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
You're right. It's the only human trait that has no genetic link. Convenient. That's why dogs and humans also have equal IQs.
6.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
You are hilarious. Schools are dominated by leftwing CRT ideology. It's the rare exception when there is real pushback against dinosaurs or evolution. I very much doubt that you are as angry about Islamic pushback against sex topics in
7.
▲
by
skellington
1y ago
Sort of like believing that we have free will.
8.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
"Your goals"...hilarious. I guess it's your world and we're all just living in it. But seriously, inequality is a complex issue, just 'let's soak the rich' is a dumb take and won't solve anything. But
9.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
HN has a very specific viewpoint on the average. Which is deeply ironic given its association with the most hardcore of venture capitalists.
10.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
Thanks for the rational reply. Totally agree, Congress must reduce spending. They had to increase the spending cap because we will be bouncing off it soon. The history of Republicans is not good when it comes to reigning in spending. Neo-co
11.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
This is incredibly dumb. What happens when the stock market is up one year and down the next? What happens when you force them all to sell and there is not enough liquidity to support current prices so the act of selling hammers the value?
12.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
You would have to double current income taxes to cover the deficit. I already pay 50%, how much do you want?
13.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
You guys just prove over and over again you don't know how anything works.
14.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
It always amazes me that we are on this super hardcore capitalist site 'hacker news' and yet so few people here know how income works at the highest levels. Super high earners don't earn W2 income. It's mostly long term
15.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
It's been proven in the past that this does not increase revenue in the long run. If you want to significantly increase revenue, you'd have to tax the middle class harder. I'm not automatically against taxing high income peop
16.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
Hard disagree (as a person that owns EV). While it's true that most people don't drive that far daily, it's also true that most people want their cars to be multipurpose. Most EVs can only be time-efficiently charged to 80% w
17.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
If you are trying to reach race/gender based quotas, you simply cannot hire white men anymore when they are 90% of the applicants. Or at least, you must attempt to minimize it as much as possible. Math.
18.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
Why can't I just buy it off AliExpress for $6000 + $50 shipping?
19.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
How do you know? Do you work for FAA? We wouldn't have to guess and allow for right-wing conjectures if FAA were just transparent on the process and if any changes have been made.
20.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
I didn't realize I was talking to George Bush. I guess the US gets to unilaterally decide what's right and wrong for the world, and kill however many people it takes to demonstrate the shining hope that is Western democracy!
21.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
I saw that. But it's laced with political overtones. The question is not just # of controllers, it's the quality of controllers. Have they lowered the standards to get through ATC school? What is the truth? Just asking so I have a
22.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
WWII was an invasion into Europe, not a civil war. Every time we've intervened in civil wars, the outcome has been bad, with one exception -- Korea. The problems with your thinking are: #1 It's how the neo-cons think and is the ju
23.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
Uh oh, you posted something factual that invites questions. HN not going to like this... >>>Facing pressure to diversify an overwhelmingly white workforce, the FAA began using a biographical test as a first screen of candidates. Mi
24.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
So the US has the moral right to install a western style gov into other countries? How many times do we have to go down this road, tear apart countries, fuck them up more, and leave with everything in worse shape than before? The US does no
25.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
I'm not saying it's right. I'm saying people will ask. It's unfortunate.
26.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
He didn't "let it devolve into a civil war." He authorized the CIA to fund rebel groups which maintained and expanded the civil war. What exactly do you suggest Obama should have done with "the power of the USA to stabil
27.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
There is no conventional war with China the US can win. Therefore, it's a big fucking waste of money to pretend we can with aircraft carriers and tanks. Nuclear weapons are relatively cheap. What the US military is good at is dropping
28.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
True, but current price isn't based on fundamentals, it's based on hype-value. nVidia is going to be a very volatile stock for years to come. I don't see deepseek changing nvidia's short term growth potential though. Eff
29.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
Markets aren't rational. NVidia is currently a hype stock which means LOTS of speculation, probably with lots of leverage. So, the people who have made large gains and/or are leveraged are highly incentivized to panic sell on any
30.
▲
by
skellington
2y ago
What other speech? There is literally no limit to what you can say if it's negative towards white men, the church, Trump, etc. Not that I'm defending those specific things. I just notice the hypocrisy.
More ›