skatesor

5 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   Again, it's all coming from somewhere . Humans can react to stimuli in the natural environment and produce sounds and turn them into words. GPT has to be spoonfed a dataset a human made at some point.
2. 2.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   It's an inherently limited model of the human brain. It pretends biology and electrochemistry aren't playing some important role 'statistics' cannot. It's GPT which has to do more legwork to be compared to a human b
3. 3.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   GPT doesn't have an 'understanding' class or a 'reasoning' function or whatever. It's a really well put together piece of statistics and sentences like these show it doesn't really have a concept of '
4. 4.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   The article isn't really denying GPT's capabilities of copying human text in a way that can fool other humans. Most of the questions these days are just a matter of 'well, can it think for itself?' or 'is it good en
5. 5.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   I mean, it said it's not.
6. 6.▲
   by skatesor 6y ago

   You have to remember the AI cannot produce sentences or even words that someone else didn't already write. I'd totally agree it is 'aware' if it could meaningfully come to conclusions like these without getting them from