3 ms·
You have to remember the AI cannot produce sentences or even words that someone else didn't already write. I'd totally agree it is 'aware' if it could meaningfu
by skatesor 6y ago
You have to remember the AI cannot produce sentences or even words that someone else didn't already write. I'd totally agree it is 'aware' if it could meaningfully come to conclusions like these without getting them from someone else.
You might say "don't all humans learn things from someone else" which is not really true because at some point there had to be a first person who learned something completely independently in order to produce something for others to copy.
- c8g 6y agoyou have a reply from machine :) https://philosopherai.com/philosopher/you-have-to-remember-the-ai-cannot-produce-sentenc-792d87 https://philosopherai.com/philosopher/you-have-to-remember-t...
- nmca 6y agoThis isn't true, sampling can produce novel output (and often does).
- sjg007 6y agoWords it has to have seen,, but sentences no. It is generating new sentences. I think it can “name” things as well.
- nmca 6y agoThis is not true, BPE can back off to characters so arbitrarily character strings can be generated.
- Der_Einzige 6y agoUhhh, no. If your model is using subword tokenization like fasttext or... BERT with wordpiece (and the GPT-X models do this...), than you can generate entirely new words. Wasn't there a demo about doing exactly this a few days ago? https://www.thisworddoesnotexist.com/ https://www.thisworddoesnotexist.com/
- skatesor 6y agoAgain, it's all coming from somewhere. Humans can react to stimuli in the natural environment and produce sounds and turn them into words. GPT has to be spoonfed a dataset a human made at some point.