sillycon-valley

5 ms·

1.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
You banned the account I replied to right? I was pointing out the conspiracy post... EDIT - because of rate limiting: I've posted in both technical articles and political articles. There have been a lot of political articles recently w
2.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
We do not agree. There was nothing credibly threatening in his tweets. This whole mess happened because of the instigating of the media and the riots all year. This event did not appear out of nowhere, there was major tension building and t
3.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Also, AVIF has support for live photos and animations. WebP afaik has a more limited feature set.
4.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Well there were pretty heavy gun regulations that were enacted under Obama. I guess Obama did allow cartels to have guns by continuing Fast & Furious so you're half right.
5.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
My point was credible threatening speech is already illegal in America. Another point would be who decides what is or isn't a joke or hateful? Do you want the companies to decide what the correct speech is, would you like a government
6.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Which recent unrest? The riots last summer are still pretty recent. I doubt most of the businesses have even recovered from it yet. edit: I don't see why I'm being downvoted, the article seems to be written when the BLM riots were
7.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
From my side, you are wrong. The stances you think I have are probably inaccurate too. Your side seems to always lock us into a prison of two ideas without letting us speak for ourselves. The extreme assumptions and generalizations don&#x27
8.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
I'd say it was mostly peaceful, especially compared to the riots. Certainly didn't last as long, it cost less in property damage, less people died, and less neighborhoods burnt down. Maybe we can ban both sides from social media a
9.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Welcome to politics, DT's words are constantly taken out of context and used to enflame the masses. That's why this censorship ordeal is scary. Both sides deserve to be heard so people can listen, hear both sides, sift through the
10.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Yeah you can think in the corner and noone will hear you like you don't exist. It's about having a voice. It's about the main argument being "it's a private company" then going and banning the alternatives.
11.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Yes people cannot think for themselves, we need to make sure they cannot speak or be near us. If they make their own platform like we tell them to, we'll just ban that too, haha.
12.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
"Bob should die" should be allowed to exist and is. It can be said jokingly, yes it's bad taste but not credible. "Bob, I am coming to kill you" or "Bob I'll kill you if you don't do X for me" a
13.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Calling people Nazi's is a great way to dehumanize someone, but not really a great way to win anyone over because it's not an argument. The only fascism I see is the censorship going around. How are they Nazis or fascists? Most wa
14.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
You'd be surprised that Trump supporters are outside the Republican realm. If you spent 5 minutes on TDW you'd see they hate most establishment Republicans. This isn't new either, it started with Ron Paul and then the Tea Par
15.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
Political pressure is a thing. Just because you can't have a direct effect individually doesn't mean you can't talk about it. We still talk and try to address climate change even though we can't do much to force China to
16.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
It's juicy. Some people's preference of "dry" varies. Some people can't fathom others liking well done, some can't fathom rare. Pink in the middle is preferred but at red it's too watery for me, to each th
17.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
alpine syntax looks very different from a quick glance at the readme. very angular-ish, template heavy with it's own syntax.
18.
by sillycon-valley 6y ago
> But there's also no reason to care if they did or not. I would liken it to Chernobyl if they did accidentally release it. If it wasn't natural then it could have been prevented, including the 2 million dead.