Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shmerl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
29 ms
·
631.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
100%. I switched to it to get true color themes support in the terminal which vim didn't have at the time, but I stayed with it because of all the extensibility for features like above.
632.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
I learned a bunch of Lua because of it :)
633.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
FYI, neovim has LSP and DAP support, as well as a bunch of other editors.
634.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
If you worry about it interfering with other stuff, you can lazy load nvim-dap + nvim-dap-ui on demand (using lazy.nvim for example), but it's not really interfering with what I use in my experience. Plus I use sessions for key mapping
635.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
What's the story with the Debian package for it? It was removed as unmaintained.
636.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
No gorilla.bas?
637.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Some trends and stats on sites that collect info on DE usage indicate that: https://www.gamingonlinux.com/index.php?module=statistics&vi... It's totally expected for me, KDE is just better if you want any kind of c
638.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
I use Kate only causally for some small temporary text snippets. I use Neovim with DAP fine using nvim-dap + nvim-dap-ui. I also recently started using LSP in neovim, and it's actually pretty powerful.
639.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
"Standards that have to be purchased". Someone is just trying to fleece the participants. That's what whole DRM is about most of the time.
640.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
KDE is more popular DE than Gnome these days and it's pretty flexible for theming.
641.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
How does it compare to Godot?
642.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
How would it ever know the answer it found is true and correct though? It could as well just repeat some existing false answer that you didn't yet find on your own. That's not much better than hallucinating it, since you can'
643.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
The reason being greed.
644.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
That's a good example of of what it should be.
645.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
It defeats the purpose. Easy to use should be something in Rust, not CUDA.
646.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Make a compiler that takes Rust and compiles into some IR, then another compiler that compiles that IR into GPU machine code. Then it can work and that's going to be your API (what you developed in Rust). That's the whole point of
647.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
To deliver, you need to make Rust target the GPU in a general way, like some IR, and then may be compile that into GPU machine code for each GPU architecture specifically. So this project is a dead end, because it's them who are these
648.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Looks like a dead end. Why CUDA? There should be some way to use Rust for GPU programming in general fashion, without being tied to Nvidia.
649.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Gaming PC can run Linux to begin with.
650.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
What a clown. Luddite level of policy making, inspired by "Ron Vara" aka Peter Navarro, who in a Kafkian fashion quoted himself as a backing for his lunatic theories.
651.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Yes. But I noticed a trend of people asking stuff like "why doesn't this work" in various community forums, which ends up being them sourcing the method from the likes of ChatGPT / Gemini, etc. Lesson - don't do tha
652.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
1984 is a good read. North Korea is somewhere there on thought police levels.
653.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
I agree that it could be a separate license, but that doesn't really contradict the point that GPLv2 was intended to prevent DRM scenarios that in practice violate basic idea of being able to run the changes. It's a natural thing
654.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
To not like GPLv3 one has be a DRM proponent. That checks out for Apple. In practice though authors of GPLv3 see it as a clarification of GPLv2, i.e. they should have the same practical intent.
655.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
For his goals at the time, but not really in the long run. Open development ecosystems like Rust are way better thriving than any closed ones.
656.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Licensing programming tools was staple MS, since it also provided lock-in. The letter comes off as the complete opposite of open source approach to it.
657.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Don't forget the infamous Open Letter to Hobbyists that followed: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Open_Letter_to_Hobbyists
658.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Very cool presentation page!
659.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
They know the word tariff. Can't be that dumb after all.
660.
▲
by
shmerl
2y ago
Whether he is an idiot or a "useful idiot" as in willingly helping his shady beneficiaries doesn't really matter, since he surrounds himself with real idiots (main qualification being willing to bootlick the boss) and somethi
More ›