4 ms·
To not like GPLv3 one has be a DRM proponent. That checks out for Apple. In practice though authors of GPLv3 see it as a clarification of GPLv2, i.e. they shou
by shmerl 2y ago
To not like GPLv3 one has be a DRM proponent. That checks out for Apple.
In practice though authors of GPLv3 see it as a clarification of GPLv2, i.e. they should have the same practical intent.
- shagie 2y agoLinus’s views on GPLv3 would be something to watch https://youtu.be/PaKIZ7gJlRU?si=263GyZd9YaPu4-PC https://youtu.be/PaKIZ7gJlRU?si=263GyZd9YaPu4-PC
- shmerl 2y agoI agree that it could be a separate license, but that doesn't really contradict the point that GPLv2 was intended to prevent DRM scenarios that in practice violate basic idea of being able to run the changes. It's a natural thing to want, even if Linus doesn't find it important.