Y
HN Search
Hacker News Search
new
|
comments
|
top
|
jobs
shmerl
searching PlanetScale…
1.
▲
2.
▲
3.
▲
4.
▲
5.
▲
6.
▲
24 ms
·
331.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
In some cases it does make sense (imagine something like Voyagers for instance where you simply can't change things even if you wanted to), but in most cases it doesn't.
332.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
> Because… some lack business value Very dumb response to the code modernization work. Just because it's not a product feature, it absolutely doesn't mean it has no business value. I also completely disagree that the lesson f
333.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
If it does almost nothing - may be not. Otherwise you'll be doing something in the main thread which will take time, unless you also squeeze concurrency (i.e. multitasking) into one thread and then again, why not use multiple threads
334.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
I see, that's good.
335.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Not necessarily the environment, but compositor itself must be fast. It shouldn't introduce any delays that would affect for instance input latency in its processing loop. Gamers would for sure complain. Someone could totally make it d
336.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It seems to rely on compton so no Wayland I guess, which makes is an interesting toy, but not a serious option.
337.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Why couldn't LuaJIT support both? Feels like a needless limitation imposed on all its users. I noticed this problem when making plugins for neovim.
338.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
> Device Support: Hardware decoding for AV1 isn’t on every device yet. By now - it should be in most devices that's aren't outdated by even average standards. And it's worth mentioning that for devices that don't ha
339.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Big Brother will be proud.
340.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
If you have the game on GOG, you can get GMDX as a separate free download: * https://www.gog.com/en/game/gmdx * https://www.gogdb.org/product/1553376539#builds
341.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
GOG has GMDX as a standalone install I think.
342.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It works on Linux in Wine.
343.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Just tested Deus Ex - Revision mod. It's pretty good so far.
344.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It wasn't promising?
345.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Did they stop developing ralloc allocator?
346.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Turkey taught Putin what should happen to his military airplanes that violate their airspace. Putin got the message very quickly. Europe should do the same instead of pretending Putin will understand any weaker response. TL;DR: shoot them d
347.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Will Debian package Deno for it?
348.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
They should spend gigawatts on something more useful instead.
349.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It's just their attempt to weasel out of the actual copyright expiration.
350.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Typical. They want to profit from copyright but they don't want it to ever expire even if the law requires it. Mickey Mouse curve is their invention.
351.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
That is true, especially when instructions are spooky like curl blah-blah | sh And people run that without thinking.
352.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
The funniest part, lol it might be in library/library/library/llibrary/liiiiiibrarrrary/llllliiiiibrary/hidden/hidden/hiding/you can’t find me/hidden/nope/never/hahahahe
353.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
That's exactly the point. Nvidia might care about industrial use cases, while they don't care about desktop Linux usage and their support is garbage in result.
354.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
If you think taking decades is an acceptable rate while others do it in a timely manner it's your own problem. For any normal user it's completely unacceptable and is the opposite of great (add to it, that even after decades of dr
355.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
JavaScript should have been LiveScript if I recall correctly. It was a mistake to put Java in its name, but now everyone has to deal with the fallout. Oracle is still wrong here, but original intent why it didn't end up being LiveScrip
356.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Taking very long to implement stuff is a perfect argument of bad support for the platform. Timely support isn't any less important than support in general.
357.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It got better, but my point is how long it took to get better. That's the indicator of how much they care about Linux use cases in general. Which is way below acceptable level - it's simply not their priority (which is also exac
358.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
> Both of which NVidia does a lot better in practice! Correction - if they care. And they don't care to do it on Linux, so you get them dragging feet for decades for something like Wayland support, PRIME, you name it. Basically, t
359.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
It's very easy to customize and remove all the visual noise though.
360.
▲
by
shmerl
1y ago
Huh, interesting. Very MS style of problem. Why can't they develop public OS interfaces for that? I.e. you don't need the full code for that, just interface libraries. Not having public interfaces in this day and age is simply dum
More ›