shaklee3

19 ms·

241.
by shaklee3 4y ago
same thing applies since they share the same airports. they'll give these planes higher priority because of the cost, but it's not enough to make an entire business from. they need the residential service to be profitable.
242.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is a common thing SpaceX people say, but in reality, it doesn't matter that much. streaming media isn't affected by latency at all, and web browsing/app usage is good enough. what really suffers is real time games or VPN
243.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I've done route planning for satellite internet for domestic flights. airplanes tend to take the exact same paths over heavily concentrated areas, and the hubs have a tremendous amount of demand around them. you can verify this by payi
244.
by shaklee3 4y ago
because then they have to make agreements with cell providers and put special antennas on for that one use case
245.
by shaklee3 4y ago
it does, and people use it today for that. JetBlue has a huge amount of usage on the ground.
246.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I've done route planning for internet service. the vast, vast majority of the time they're in busy areas. you're talking about outliers.
247.
by shaklee3 4y ago
by choice. if you want the media attention for your good Samaritan act when you send them, you also get the negative attention when you renege.
248.
by shaklee3 4y ago
viasat will have viasat-3 by then, which is about 5x their total current capacity.
249.
by shaklee3 4y ago
viasat can offer the same speeds for that price, and they do on business jets.
250.
by shaklee3 4y ago
> Planes spend a lot of time in areas that aren't populate no, planes spend most of their time in populated areas. specifically near major airports, and the WiFi needs to work on the ground as well.
251.
by shaklee3 4y ago
the problem is that not every one of these streaming devices supports all services, so you end up having a few of them. plus, the free LG channels that come with the TV are great. you get 24x7 channels of some good shows.
252.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is patently false. look at the Twitter user that compares pictures to SLR shots of what he sees. pixels are always the most color accurate
253.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is true. you can follow @dalevon_digital on Twitter and he frequently does slr/iPhone/pixel blind comparisons. the pixel has won every single one when compared to a reference SLR picture.
254.
by shaklee3 4y ago
no, iPhone is far more overprocessed. see dpreview or any other legitimate camera review site. iPhone cameras/software are just lackluster compared to the competition. things like HDR on iPhone have been bad for years.
255.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Starlink is not going to be faster than this necessarily. Starlink is also low bandwidth, but has to be compatible with all phones. So they are not able to design hardware in the phone with a better antenna for this purpose as Apple can d
256.
by shaklee3 4y ago
the British office lasted one season, while the American version lasted 9. Gervais also wrote much of the American one.
257.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Except the FCC, users on Reddit, most news outlets doing investigative journalism, etc.
258.
by shaklee3 4y ago
cruise ships, like airlines are notorious penny pinchers. this is more for publicity than anything. keep in mind that beams are full now will only a couple thousand active users, which is what these large ships have. they'll have to ch
259.
by shaklee3 4y ago
this is why he said it could take 30 min to get a text out. it's essentially noise/a very low bit rate on uplink.
260.
by shaklee3 4y ago
starlink so far has been lackluster compared to the promises, and it's only getting worse.
261.
by shaklee3 4y ago
you can't create "extra powerful antennas" in a cell phone. it's physics, and antenna gain is driven by size.
262.
by shaklee3 4y ago
you need to heat the oil so it polymerizes and creates a strong nonstick bond. if you simply wipe it with oil when it's hot it will get sticky and not season properly.
263.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I know, but they need more subscriptions and those subscriptions to be faster given these latest results.
264.
by shaklee3 4y ago
> Starlink is going to sue over this, and they'll win. By 2028 Starlink expects to have two orders of magnitude more capacity than they do now. 15x as many satellites, with an order of magnitude more capacity per satellite and an or
265.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I do believe that, yes. and that's not the hardest part in the whole thing. the scheduling is.
266.
by shaklee3 4y ago
it will be something similar to dvbs2. not even close to the Shannon limit since it's extremely power-limited. MFTDMA.
267.
by shaklee3 4y ago
it literally never does that. I'm on spectrum right now and had one outage in 8 years.
268.
by shaklee3 4y ago
no, it's not. it's not capable of meeting those speeds with the number of users they need to be profitable. if what you say is true they simply could have grown the network slower and kept the speeds higher. but they can't, b
269.
by shaklee3 4y ago
This comment isn't adding anything to the discussion. SpaceX has stated they meet a certain standard of service. They have not according to speed test results. They were never going to be able to meet it given the amount of customers t
270.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I've had 5 cable providers in different cities and never experienced that. usually they overprovision you to make your plan look even better.

More ›