shaklee3

30 ms·

271.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I'm not sure why you're being downvoted when this is entirely correct.
272.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Hughes did not win in the 100Mbps category. you're comparing apples and oranges.
273.
by shaklee3 4y ago
On the other hand, you will not find a Roblox programming book in a used bookstore, and almost certainly not a new bookstore either.
274.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I'm not missing the point. The OP was specifically talking about a k8s bug that wasn't a k8s bug at all. You don't blame Linux for a poorly written application. If the cloud providers choose to add a bunch of uncommon options
275.
by shaklee3 4y ago
exactly. if you read the bug it's clearly not a k8s issue. they cannot control aws jabbering elb bugs.
276.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I wasn't trying to be snide; I didn't understand what the search had to do with the company. everyone I've met (including on this thread) have high opinions of Yandex, so to each their own.
277.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I'm not sure if you noticed, but the Yandex comment was not about the search, but the software engineering and open source projects coming from them.
278.
by shaklee3 4y ago
California renewed it for next year
279.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Xfinity works just fine, and you haven't used starlink yet. grass is always greener.
280.
by shaklee3 4y ago
none of these things you mentioned are specific to Android. this happens on iOS too.
281.
by shaklee3 4y ago
python has had virtual environments forever now. what was it missing?
282.
by shaklee3 4y ago
the only data I'm aware of has a starlink launch around $25M, and a geo launch is around $70M. if you have newer numbers please point to the source. starship won't be around anyone soon, and they need the money now.
283.
by shaklee3 4y ago
from a Tool song (won't write the name): And in between Sips of coke He told me that He thought We were sellin' out Layin' down, Suckin' up To the man Well now I've got some A-dvice for you, little buddy Before you
284.
by shaklee3 4y ago
starlink is great for some. my comments aren't necessarily about whether it's overall good or not: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32095920
285.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I've elaborated and gotten shouted down enough on the old threads that it's not worth repeating the whole thing. tldr: 1) the beams are not full, so many users are getting unrealistic service since they're not doing traffic s
286.
by shaklee3 4y ago
he's been doing it on starlink too, but he gets a pass on HN for that one.
287.
by shaklee3 4y ago
yes, SpaceX sells launches to anyone who will buy them since it's their only profitable business at the moment. this is why viasat is using them to launch this year or next. I just gave you the cost, and it's public on their websi
288.
by shaklee3 4y ago
SpaceX sells a launch to customers for $50-70M. they make an estimated 10-30% profit, depending on your source and whether the rocket is reused. that is nowhere near an order of magnitude.
289.
by shaklee3 4y ago
It does matter. When you make claims that a small group of people say is not possible and are quickly shouted down, only later to be completely ignored, it matters. It's the same reason FSD coming "next year" for 5 years matt
290.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I literally just said that 16APSK has been used for a decade on Geo satellites. I don't know if you aren't aware what modulation means, but that is the modulation. it does not matter at all what size the gateway or the user antenn
291.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I'm not sure what point you're trying to make here. starlink is also multiple smaller beams within a single beam for frequency reuse. a single beam does not get more bandwidth (in Gbps) than a viasat terminal. > You still need
292.
by shaklee3 4y ago
Ahhhh, so when Elon musk himself says pings will be < 20ms, he's talking about just the satellite segment, right? because obviously everyone pings just the satellite segment. https://twitter.com/elonmusk/status&
293.
by shaklee3 4y ago
that's simply not true. they have transponders that should deliver 10Gbps to a single user IF they were willing to pay for both the service and terminal. SpaceX is limited in the exact same way, and their terminals + satellite costs a
294.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I'm not sure why this has to do with network engineers in Redmond. SpaceX doesn't control the rest of the internet, and they don't have enough POPs (and won't) to hit the latency elon promised. there's a reason why
295.
by shaklee3 4y ago
SpaceX started a LEO system as ambitious as SpaceX for its time back in 2013. again, GEO to LEO is not LEO to LEO, and is also not moon to earth. there are no successful examples of 20+Gbps between LEO satellites. The million details is why
296.
by shaklee3 4y ago
you should probably have worked for Facebook a few years back when they threw billions at the problem and couldn't solve it.
297.
by shaklee3 4y ago
are you really comparing the moon to the earth with two satellites at much closer distances moving rapidly?
298.
by shaklee3 4y ago
I've had their service for 4 years straight in the past. it's not as good as cable, but it's nowhere near as bad as you say if you're not playing real time games. the constrained BOM is the very reason why the terminal c
299.
by shaklee3 4y ago
they are not an order of magnitude lower. when you make comments like that you're not trying to have a serious dialogue.
300.
by shaklee3 4y ago
it's not an attack, you are always pro starlink and I'm always anti starlink (in a business sense). there's nothing wrong with different opinions. I just don't agree with the comments that the latency, speed, or cost wil

More ›