shaklee3

29 ms·

331.
by shaklee3 5y ago
any idea if podman will support GPU? I couldn't get it to work.
332.
by shaklee3 5y ago
it's highly unlikely that the performance will be great on GPU if it generates its own kernels. cutensor has been hand optimized to do exactly these types of operations in a way emitting a kernel automatically can't do.
333.
by shaklee3 5y ago
If you're comparing it to the MI250 you're comparing it to 2 separate chips on a single card. This is fundamentally different and unless you have an ideal workload or have optimized appropriately, it's not going to hit anywhe
334.
by shaklee3 5y ago
this isn't true. the phi was extremely complex to program for, and it was not simply a port of standard x86 code. it required you to pay attention to multiple levels of memory hierarchy, just as the GPU did.
335.
by shaklee3 5y ago
how so? what is this bad at for scientific computing?
336.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I should have capitalized Pixel, since I meant the phone. iphone doesn't do this as far as I know. if I remember correctly it's to blur the background.
337.
by shaklee3 5y ago
yes, they do fuse different lenses together on pixels
338.
by shaklee3 5y ago
kenji just released his new book (700 pages) on woks. while OP is correct about the heat deltas, it makes no difference in practice if you have the right technique. if you want to dispute that, you're going to be disputing someone who
339.
by shaklee3 5y ago
his book came out a couple days ago. highly recommend it.
340.
by shaklee3 5y ago
that is a completely separate layer run by and built by a different company using technology from 20 years ago
341.
by shaklee3 5y ago
try the NYTimes buttermilk recipe. it's outstanding.
342.
by shaklee3 5y ago
tf32 and fp16 tensor cores are completely different, and tf32 is not 16 bit multiplication.
343.
by shaklee3 5y ago
what about alpha?
344.
by shaklee3 5y ago
on a related note, where do people find artists to make logos/mascots like that?
345.
by shaklee3 5y ago
no, it's a fact, and what you said is misleading. 2 shots is not considered fully vaccinated anymore, especially with a country who had the booster before anyone.
346.
by shaklee3 5y ago
Israel is only about 60% fully vaccinated.
347.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I also have more than a decade of experience with satellite internet, and geostationary satellites in particular. Nobody has ever said starlink will be technically impossible; the arguments from the start have been that it is not financiall
348.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I see your other comments and you seem very sharp, but I don't understand why you think starlink will be any different, and especially why the initial launch period is anything like a mature service. for instance, do you disagree with
349.
by shaklee3 5y ago
musk said it https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-ch...
350.
by shaklee3 5y ago
https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-spacex-starlink-ch...
351.
by shaklee3 5y ago
highways don't go door to door, and that's what they were suggesting.
352.
by shaklee3 5y ago
and the biggest chassis can handle 12 of those cards.
353.
by shaklee3 5y ago
they announced they hit 145,000 customers, so that math doesn't add up. they will need roughly 50:1 to be anywhere near profitable.
354.
by shaklee3 5y ago
starlink is possibly the most hyped on the financial side. there are virtually no scenarios where they can make money and still maintain the plans they have now. I know people will disagree, but we'll have to see in a few years.
355.
by shaklee3 5y ago
they are going to oversubscribe it. they're only slow to add users because they can't make terminals, not because they're trying to maintain an unrealistic QoS.
356.
by shaklee3 5y ago
That's exactly my point. they are the exact same speeds, which is not what OP said.
357.
by shaklee3 5y ago
so, when you compare to cable do you also say 25-50Mbps speeds? because that's the minimum cable speed I'm my area. But 1Gb is the max. since when has comparing minimum speeds ever been a valid comparison?
358.
by shaklee3 5y ago
their fastest package is 100Mbps, which is the same as starlink for most people. I'm not sure where you're getting your information.
359.
by shaklee3 5y ago
that's not how modern satellites work. there are overlapping frequency bands and polarizations in the same location that do not interfere. there's also tdma to prevent interference.
360.
by shaklee3 5y ago
no, it's not. streaming media is the vast majority of internet traffic, and it doesn't care at all about your latency. your capacity math is so far off it's just crazy. if they had a million times the capacity of current sate

More ›