shaklee3

30 ms·

361.
by shaklee3 5y ago
what's stopping them is fsd has been promised on all these cars without those sensors. taking that away would likely mean a lawsuit
362.
by shaklee3 5y ago
these terminals and plans aren't for the rdof program.
363.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I don't agree with that. the likelihood of them reducing the cost of the antenna to what it needs to be in Africa is close to 0. even legacy satellite providers, with terminals that are 1/5 the cost cannot do it. and those aren&#x
364.
by shaklee3 5y ago
no, the antenna is cheap and cannot receive from more than one at a time. nothing to do with fcc.
365.
by shaklee3 5y ago
because they have no users yet. once the satellites are filled you're back to the status quo.
366.
by shaklee3 5y ago
this is not really true relative to what OP said. there are fcc regulations for spectral leakage and such, but that's well known and means you can't transmit outside a service area. but that just means you're in another, adja
367.
by shaklee3 5y ago
you're getting better service than the others because they are not at capacity, and won't be until the chip shortage is over. enjoy it while you can, because speeds will get worse soon, and what you thought was a great service wil
368.
by shaklee3 5y ago
his new wok cookbook comes out in 2 months as well
369.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I upvoted you just because your blog is great.
370.
by shaklee3 5y ago
that's my point, though. they're nowhere near capacity and you're comparing it to solutions that are at capacity (DSL). just wait until they need to make more money and the system is capacity constrained.
371.
by shaklee3 5y ago
starship is nowhere near ready to launch, and their Boca chica facility is now halted due to epa regulations
372.
by shaklee3 5y ago
that's not what it means to be a product. it's a beta service that's nowhere near capacity. it would be like saying a website that served a hundred people is clearly capable of providing the same service to a million.
373.
by shaklee3 5y ago
if you have access to TMobile 5g there's absolutely no reason to get starlink.
374.
by shaklee3 5y ago
India is an extremely poor example since the other 59% can't afford $100/mo. and keep in mind the terminal cost for them is extremely high still.
375.
by shaklee3 5y ago
anecdotes don't really prove anything. while you can pay $100/mo, most people in rural America can't, and that's who they need for the most underserved users.
376.
by shaklee3 5y ago
every credible source I've seen has shown it's not going to make financial sense. so far the returns are extremely poor, and their user adds are far from where they wanted blame the supply shortage or whatever you want, but they&#
377.
by shaklee3 5y ago
SpaceX has not shown anything is cheap yet since they're not a public company and you can't see their financials. yes, they're reusing parts of the rocket, but as musk said recently, it's much more expensive than they wa
378.
by shaklee3 5y ago
it's in the article. whether it draws more power to heat a BUC or has a dedicated heater, it's a deicer.
379.
by shaklee3 5y ago
yes, they do. they have a deicer.
380.
SpaceX's Boca Chica facility may be illegally dodging NEPA regulations(esghound.substack.com)
35 points by shaklee3 5y ago|11 comments
381.
by shaklee3 5y ago
I think 128GB/s should be single direction, as 32GB/s was single direction for gen 4.
382.
by shaklee3 5y ago
they can easily extend the number of lanes. there are many examples of much higher speed serdes point to point.
383.
by shaklee3 5y ago
100%. they're nowhere near the satellite/user ratio they're planning.
384.
by shaklee3 5y ago
> For anyone who has seen packet loss, jitter and transfer quotas on deeply oversubscribed consumer geostationary services, this is amazing. starlink is not even close to oversubscribed, so I'm not sure why you're making this c
385.
by shaklee3 5y ago
can you explain how web3 solves your issue?
386.
by shaklee3 5y ago
this is not true: https://www.seriouseats.com/what-are-the-best-eggs
387.
by shaklee3 5y ago
organic milk mostly tastes different because it's pasteurized at a higher temperature. this makes it last longer and gives it a more of a cooked taste. it's personal preference if it tastes better.
388.
by shaklee3 5y ago
he really is one of the best technical bloggers out there. I've learned a ton from his c++ articles.
389.
by shaklee3 5y ago
fascinating read, and Raymond seems like an immensely productive person.
390.
by shaklee3 5y ago
this is pretty much exactly what he says in the article.

More ›