sgregnt

12 ms·

91.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I think it is not so much as Israel has discrimination, but about the region. By comparison to PA or other Arab countries there is very little discrimination in Israel. If the whole region is set on a path for pluralism that would also sol
92.
by sgregnt 5y ago
There are other western countries with very strict immigration policies. I think this applies to Switzerland and to Japan, for example.
93.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I feel this is a reaction to various PA policies. In PA, there is a law that selling land to Israelis is punished by death. In Gaza, Hamas declaration of principles states that the goal of Hamas is to destroy the state of Israel.
94.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Facebook never bent to apease anyone you are confusing facebook with Google
95.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Many people all the time. All my relatives and many of my friends.
96.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Some time you need to take sides. Perhaps if that happened in 33, 34, 35... we would not have 39.
97.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I wish people who wish facebook to be banned (or any other communication / news app) would be publically shamed in the USA.
98.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I worked in public sector and was constantly bothered by the wastful.spending unaccpuntability, bull#@$ and politics. It was like a British of a fresh air to move to private sector. By comparison way more efficiently way less bull#$#@ and
99.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Thank you, I'm sorry for the harsh response and you're right about my phrasing, I improve next time. But I can hardly see how the quoted part of the OP comment maybe explains by > simply wrong about some of the facts to me it s
100.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I think Israel is a Western Democraty for these reasons: "Western", due to its cultural ties and since it shares western values. "Democracy" because of many institutions, including the rule of all, the free elections and
101.
by sgregnt 5y ago
In my humble opinion, the western democracies, like Israel, came a long way since Galileo but many places haven't. That is, "the ruling class" would still behead you or otherwise kill you in shadows or openly e.g. Saudi Arabi
102.
by sgregnt 5y ago
In the long run it might hurt small book shops as well, as the number of new books published in France drops, especially books published by new authors (as they are less likely to sell at high prices) and the number of books people read dro
103.
by sgregnt 5y ago
> This sounds like what a client of a drug dealer would say. Maybe it's an indication that you are so impartial that you equate facebook with drug dealer?
104.
by sgregnt 5y ago
So the court is not over yet? The allegation might not be proven true?
105.
by sgregnt 5y ago
> Who is anyone to speak for the entire world? But we still get to speak. So why then speak for the "entire world"? It would be much better phrased if some one wrote: "*in my opinion* the entire world is ... ", even
106.
by sgregnt 5y ago
> has paid for their gross violations of trust and privacy of the entire world. Sorry, but who are you to speak for the entire world? You may not like facebook and google personally, but it is far streach to think you know to represent o
107.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Well "biased" means that you are not doing an independent impartial assessment of the facts. So admittedly, you're saying your opinion is based off something other than pure facts? I believe I do know how facebook operates t
108.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Facebook is not owned by Zuck he is just a CEO. I thought this is obvious so didn't stress this fact writing Zuch but meaning FB. Facebook is a public company and as such this company is owned by public. When I say Zuck does not have f
109.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I believe the way this answer is stated, paints a very biased picture. Allow me to provide an alternative vision, which I believe is shared by many (though not as vocal as the other opinion). So, let me share my hopes here: Maybe some peopl
110.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I thought he is pushed to censor by the US and other governments, and practically does not have much room for freedom.
111.
by sgregnt 5y ago
While it might sound moderate "..balance to achieve..." in my opinion in this is very dangerous thought... as it assumes a lot of hidden things to name a few: 1. that the balance is the same for different people, 2. that the balan
112.
by sgregnt 5y ago
I don't think Facebook is forcing anything, any tiny bit. Maybe that's what we disagree about. I think you are 100% free not to use any facebook products.
113.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Teo out of top of my head: 1. Because they will cost more 2. I don't want my child to connect without me knowing.
114.
by sgregnt 5y ago
In my opinion a world is a much better place with people like Zuck.
115.
by sgregnt 5y ago
The example with facebook is quite different from Gov. Your interaction with facebook is 100% voluntarily, you don't like facebook then you can say bye! With the government you have no room for flexibility.
116.
by sgregnt 5y ago
If for some reason,now or in the future, I prefer my peripherals to be connected to cloud. Your law deprives me of this freedom. Just a thought.
117.
by sgregnt 5y ago
But the rent money not paid by the tenant, is not recieved by the landlord so while tenant will spend more the landlord will be spend less, the net change is zero, no?
118.
by sgregnt 5y ago
Though, it sound like the bottom line us good: completion helps consumers, as the efficiency goes up (no unefficient small middle man) and eventually the price goes down?
119.
by sgregnt 5y ago
So the assumption is that currently, without instagram for kids, kids are not using social media at all and are not exposed to adult content on the internet? Are we living on the same planet? I dont understand this, instagram for kids is su
120.
by sgregnt 5y ago
> The main point is "It was simply obvious that early harping about it from Tucker Carlson was a useless distraction in the early time of the pandemic, " "Simply obvious" - who is to draw the line? Where do you find t

More ›