While it might sound moderate "..balance to achieve..." in my opinion in this is very dangerous thought... as it assumes a lot of hidden things to name a few: 1

While it might sound moderate "..balance to achieve..." in my opinion in this is very dangerous thought... as it assumes a lot of hidden things to name a few: 1. that the balance is the same for different people, 2. that the balance is not evolving over time, 3. that people can vote for "good" politicians to suggest good balance but at the same time can't figure out themselves how and if to use Facebook. 4. That the proper balance can be found at all. 5. That the side effect elsewhere will not bring worse overall outcome. 6. That an alternative better free market solution (better optimal) would not be prevented by getting stuck in a local minima 7. That facebook will not find a way to circumvent the new balance. 8. That it's the best use of regulators involved in it to figure out the best balance rather than thinking of something else 9. That it will not increase the value of lobbying and more...