setquk

69 ms·

661.
by setquk 8y ago
Infinity war had an hour long intermission before anything started for me :(
662.
by setquk 8y ago
That is the idea. Increase the risk and arbitrary non viability of loopholes. No one will touch it so the only way to move forwards is minimal risk.
663.
by setquk 8y ago
It’s even worse. Sometimes the packages that the DRAM ICs are encapsulated in have minor radioactive elements in and alpha particles emitted can flip bits. Interesting paper: https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-11/Dinaburg
664.
by setquk 8y ago
I think that's intentional as it massively increases the risk of doing something negative for the end user and leaves loopholes uncertain and prone to interpretation. It will forces businesses to stay well clear of the line or pack up
665.
by setquk 8y ago
This is the entire point of the GDPR really. It appears to be working.
666.
by setquk 8y ago
That sounds very feasible. He has probably been advised to sue everyone to get his medical bills paid.
667.
by setquk 8y ago
Whoever trained him or was responsible for him is liable then.
668.
by setquk 8y ago
Perhaps surprisingly, you don't usually turn the power off when doing supply work. That is an incredibly rare event. And it's perfectly safe to work on if you have the right PPE. That 15-20 foot would have been some new pants rath
669.
by setquk 8y ago
Most of those sorts of things are done on live kit. There are procedures and equipment that reduce the risk to virtually nothing. Which weren’t used clearly.
670.
by setquk 8y ago
Yep. In that case Tesla shouldn’t even be mentioned in this. It just makes a good headline. I’m perpetually surprised at how crap even supposedly trained electricians are. At best they don’t understand the consequences of not doing somethi
671.
by setquk 8y ago
If there was an arc flash risk he should have been wearing appropriate PPE. Arc flash is something you don’t argue with. It burns and blinds you almost instantly and fires vaporised metal into your torso potentially killing you. I’d like t
672.
by setquk 8y ago
Two years newer than mine :)
673.
by setquk 8y ago
Basic telemetry is HUGE. You can't opt out of basic on Pro either. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/privacy/basic-level... There's enough information in there to identify a machine and user
674.
by setquk 8y ago
Go have a look around. Since about 2010 it's frowned upon. There are a few dealers who do it but most of the new cars don't have them.
675.
by setquk 8y ago
Yeah it only comes bundled if you do a "full" install off the MacOS media. I do a fresh minimal install on mine. Windows users, myself included, have always been upset about the bundling. When you buy a PC these days you have to s
676.
by setquk 8y ago
That isn’t the norm here in the UK at least.
677.
by setquk 8y ago
Probably means Garage Band, which is free multi-track recording software. How dare they ship privacy respecting productivity software with their OS instead of Candy Crush!
678.
by setquk 8y ago
You're missing the point. Do you buy a car and have to peel all the advertising stickers off the windscreen, disable the tracking devices and scrub candy crush off the dashboard. Nope.
679.
by setquk 8y ago
Yep. My only that some of the UWP apps you can’t uninstall easily like Xbox etc. Really the deal breakers for me recently are: 1. Privacy defaults to none and can only be optimised for none in Windows 10. Only did they back down for enterpr
680.
by setquk 8y ago
Privacy: ability to opt out of all data collection. Microsoft privacy: inability to opt out of all data collection unless you pay for enterprise edition. This makes a mockery of any policy.
681.
by setquk 8y ago
This is a very good question. I suspect that at some point someone will fire up their lawyers and find an answer. Not only that but you can’t opt out from data collection at the moment.
682.
by setquk 8y ago
Agree entirely. This should apply to all cloud services. If you use them for anything critical, total migration and DR should be part of your exit strategy for if anything like this happens. Everything you have in the cloud should be backed
683.
by setquk 8y ago
I think you can only cite the likes of PETA for such things therefore undermining any credibility instantly.
684.
by setquk 8y ago
It’s still not great and it’s a lot slower than putty.
685.
by setquk 8y ago
I think you are right but introducing a new paradigm (usually smart) over a standard operating model is a mistake. These are all problems we have solved for years before without the technology so there are established ways of handling the s
686.
by setquk 8y ago
You can’t fix idiots. We already know that.
687.
by setquk 8y ago
I’ve got my last smartphone. I’ll use it until it dies or Apple abandons it. I’ve come to the conclusion I’d rather spend the money on a hobby instead. Im also getting really fucking annoyed at how much stuff is broken for the amount of mon
688.
by setquk 8y ago
Agree entirely. Look at the Brinks CompuSafe hack in 2015. Anything which increases the attack surface of a device reduces the security. In that case, a USB port. And that wasn't even made by the lowest bidding startup.
689.
by setquk 8y ago
I’m going to teach my children how to navigate the world of insane Harry-Potter-esque rules which all IaaS/PaaS platforms enforce upon you. They will become software language lawyers and be masters of the electric Disney dollar. You kn
690.
by setquk 8y ago
The legal basis is that google operate the largest video delivery site. If they fail to whitelist smaller organisations then they are operating anti competitively. The CA situation is a different model. To be honest the whole trustworthy CA

More ›