seppin

18 ms·

31.
by seppin 6y ago
> Those police were doing crowd control. If they were not deployed there would have been no on-duty injuries. "The Bank security guard would have never been hurt if they just let people steal the money and take hostages." >
32.
by seppin 6y ago
Calls to violence were not, and are not, protected speech. It is a false argument to say they should be now.
33.
by seppin 6y ago
> You're right, the women's march protests were far more dangerous. This is beyond bad faith, this is an open "fuck you" to anyone that dares participate in this discussion. To shut it down, to make any sort of dialog
34.
by seppin 6y ago
Maybe you don't know that 60 Capital Police were seriously injured, 15 remain in the hospital, and one is confirmed dead from the attack. Maybe you don't know that of the 4 rioters that died, one had a heart attack (unconfirmed),
35.
by seppin 6y ago
> I am attacking your idea directly, not you. This is why I don't talk politics, ever. You simply cannot attack a person's idea in politics, because their ideas are their identity. They will respond with the ferocity in which t
36.
by seppin 6y ago
Such further isolation and radicalization was inevitable, large companies weren't going to host the process on their servers. As they have every right not to do.
37.
by seppin 6y ago
I don't value Facebook at $2 a month, I bet most people don't either.
38.
by seppin 6y ago
Tell that to FB and Linkedin's valuations.
39.
by seppin 6y ago
Being an online bank is largely unprofitable. You still have to operate the backend of a normal bank (which is costly) and you don't have the physical locations to enable the trust you need to get enough customers.
40.
by seppin 6y ago
I'm sorry are you implying the headline "Jack Ma is Missing" is cute?
41.
by seppin 6y ago
I agree as well, but with all respect this is dangerously close to "she is such a nice girl what she even doing at that club?" Perhaps he knew the risks and chose to speak out anyways, which is an entirely different conversation.
42.
by seppin 6y ago
fair enough. still "play ball or we disappear you" shouldn't ever be open to victim blaming.
43.
by seppin 6y ago
Perhaps a rising superpower that both sells you every plastic trinket you own and operates concentration camps is story people want to read about.
44.
by seppin 6y ago
It's BS. Jeffrey Epstein was rich. John McAfee too.
45.
by seppin 6y ago
"China is the best place in the world to start a company" Here is what happens if you succeed to the highest level.
46.
by seppin 6y ago
If it was that easy to displace the dollar, someone would have done it already. What advantage does a Chinese cryptocurrency have over a traditional one?
47.
by seppin 6y ago
It's exactly my point. Outside of Apple, all the biggest tech firms are 100% reliant on a form of income that is, at best, partially fraudulent. More realistically, almost entirely so.
48.
by seppin 6y ago
> Even Google has other revenue streams. How long do they survive in their current form relying solely on them?
49.
by seppin 6y ago
> First, that his show aired on RT I'm done with this bad faith nonsense, i've addressed the multiple people trying to shift the conversation away from what I said towards RT. Assange, the guy that promised us all he would &quo
50.
by seppin 6y ago
This is no industry with as much snake oil BS as adtech. It also happens to be the sole form of revenue all of the largest tech firms enjoy. No wonder there hasn't been a real audit. Also, all those marketing execs buying all the ads w
51.
by seppin 6y ago
> Do you feel the same towards writers being used by the CIA to spread their stories? As per the previous question, it appears you don't understand what journalism is. Journalists report stories as objectively as possible, they don&
52.
by seppin 6y ago
I'm aware, OP compared the two
53.
by seppin 6y ago
> I do not have any idea what you consider to be journalism Not being part of an information warfare campaign of an autocratic country's intelligence service, as we have definitive proof Wikileaks was. The fact that you keep saying
54.
by seppin 6y ago
> And they are free to coordinate with a political campaign, they have the freedom of assembly as well as of the press. lol. "None of these things are crimes" is not the solid argument you think it is. To be a useful idiot aidi
55.
by seppin 6y ago
curious, have you had any successes ? (respectfully)
56.
by seppin 6y ago
yep, group think is as strong here as anywhere on reddit or facebook
57.
by seppin 6y ago
Russia hacked both the DNC and the RNC. They only leaked DNC material (via their cutout Wikileaks so people can claim in bad faith it wasn't really Russia), and did so at the time it was most needed by the Trump campaign. If you consid
58.
by seppin 6y ago
> Publishing reliable information that is politically relevant Trying desperately to turn emails (that amounted mostly to dirty laundry) stolen by a government into manufactured scandals and conspiracies the day after the worst revelatio
59.
by seppin 6y ago
Again, it's proof of a relationship. His actions via Wikileaks is proof he is a Russian asset. King and Ventura didn't participate in a coordinated attack on American democracy, so your comparison remains useless. > If there wa
60.
by seppin 6y ago
Downvote opposing views without response and move on. This website is pathetic.

More ›