3 ms·

> You're right, the women's march protests were far more dangerous. This is beyond bad faith, this is an open "fuck you" to anyone that dares participate in th

by seppin 6y ago

> You're right, the women's march protests were far more dangerous. This is beyond bad faith, this is an open "fuck you" to anyone that dares participate in this discussion. To shut it down, to make any sort of dialogue impossible. And you say the left wants to censor, what a laugh.

ufmace 6y ago
The only "bad faith" going on here is the left's pathetic attempt to shut down any mention of the political violence that they have been encouraging and celebrating for the last 4 years and the 6 months of nationwide rioting they've cheered on.
- forserious 6y ago
  You clearly don't understand what a bad faith argument is. Every word you say demonstrates it.
- seppin 6y ago
  "Yeah but what about" isn't a valid respond under any circumstances, especially not when you are trying to deny that you argue solely in bad faith. Your state of denial and victimhood complex make any discussion impossible.
  - beerandt 6y ago
    The Equal Protection Clause is literally, the legal/ constitutional application of "Whataboutism." There are many (most) cases whataboutism is merely an excuse or distraction, but here, it's the very basis of the ongoing argument. That most of the left doesn't even realize this is a big part of the problem.
    - forserious 6y ago
      More bad faith. You're conflating legal acts with illegal acts. This isn't a case of a double standard. You are arguing that these events are double standards, and they are plainly not. This is the bad faith.
    - seppin 6y ago
      https://twitter.com/mickeydelo/status/1348312979129905155 https://twitter.com/mickeydelo/status/1348312979129905155 That's a video of a capital police officer being beaten by the mob. If you have anything remotely similar to show the world from the women's match (that would trigger the Equal Protection Clause), go ahead and show it. Falsely flagged and no response, that's what I thought. Take your bad faith nonsense elsewhere.

by seppin 6y ago

ufmace 6y ago

The only "bad faith" going on here is the left's pathetic attempt to shut down any mention of the political violence that they have been encouraging and celebrating for the last 4 years and the 6 months of nationwide rioting they've cheered on.

forserious 6y ago
You clearly don't understand what a bad faith argument is. Every word you say demonstrates it.
seppin 6y ago
"Yeah but what about" isn't a valid respond under any circumstances, especially not when you are trying to deny that you argue solely in bad faith. Your state of denial and victimhood complex make any discussion impossible.
- beerandt 6y ago
  The Equal Protection Clause is literally, the legal/ constitutional application of "Whataboutism." There are many (most) cases whataboutism is merely an excuse or distraction, but here, it's the very basis of the ongoing argument. That most of the left doesn't even realize this is a big part of the problem.
  - forserious 6y ago
    More bad faith. You're conflating legal acts with illegal acts. This isn't a case of a double standard. You are arguing that these events are double standards, and they are plainly not. This is the bad faith.
  - seppin 6y ago
    https://twitter.com/mickeydelo/status/1348312979129905155 https://twitter.com/mickeydelo/status/1348312979129905155 That's a video of a capital police officer being beaten by the mob. If you have anything remotely similar to show the world from the women's match (that would trigger the Equal Protection Clause), go ahead and show it. Falsely flagged and no response, that's what I thought. Take your bad faith nonsense elsewhere.