sdfhdhjdw3

11 ms·

1.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
I'm still reeling with what I just watched....
2.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
What's the explanation for this? I mean, surely the explanation isn't that Trump is secretly a well informed and thoughtful person?
3.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> all day sitting working in the Math Lab What I tell people is that my powerful brain needs a lot of calories.
4.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
He's just repeating Russian propaganda. Russia has been saying "if Finland joins NATO, there will be consequences" since forever. When Finland actually joins Russia says "yeah no problem it's not really a threat&quo
5.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
This is the definition I'm using > 1 : a loser or predicted loser in a struggle or contest I think it fits. Russia loses a lot.
6.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> Russia was on reasonably good terms with Europe for at least 2 decades. Russia has been at war with Europe in Ukraine for 8 years you moron.
7.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> Georgia got hit for the same reason Ukraine did - because it tried to join our gang. Man, Russia is really losing this game then. Because countries keep joining Nato. Findland and Sweden now. Sweden has had a policy of neutrality for 2
8.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> Logically if you want an existential threat to Russia to expand up against Russian borders you must want war, no? No you see, this isn't "NATO expanding up to"... Countries are sovereign to choose their allies. And count
9.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
They have to, because in reality they have less to appeal people with. The ONLY thing that Russia has going to its propaganda is that they're the underdog. Everything else is a lie.
10.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> With the horrendous things we did to Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya... it's no wonder Russians want pushback on NATO encroachment on bordering states. With the horrendous things that Russia has done throughout it's history in easte
11.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Why is it that in this story, Russia is always depicted as having no agency? "Ukraine CHOSE to join nato, so Russia HAD to invade." No, the cause of the destruction here is Russia's invasion. Ukraine can choose whatever allie
12.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> Because the Global American Empire is always on the side of what is bad, wrong, or immoral. Here's a simple rule to guide you. If GAE says it's good, it's bad. If GAE says it's bad then it's good. Remember that
13.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Why is that?
14.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Sending money in the UK is faster than it takes me to open the app on the phone to confirm it went thru.
15.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> The current crash (...) What I keep coming back to is that something worth zero is still trading at $20k.
16.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> You are free to choose whatever standard of evidence you see fit, but personally, I will always choose to reserve strong judgement (like calling someone a scumbag) until I am confident that I fully understand the details. You'll g
17.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/richardnieva/worldcoin-... You asked me exactly what "instrinsics" are people being stripped from. So according to that article, people are being robbed of the abilit
18.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
There's no value prop in getting your eyeball scanned in exchange for magic beans.
19.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
I don't agree to anything, because I don't know enough about it. They SAY they don't collect data, they SAY it's a zero knowledge proof. Who knows about that. What I know is that they're extracting some value from p
20.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Not everything is a question of "does it collect data", actually. They're collecting _some_ value from individuals, whether you understand it or not. Your comment reminds me of Facebook's disingenuous "we we'r
21.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
They were offering shitcoins in exchange to people scanning their eyeballs. That's a double-whammy of dodgy behavior. No, I don't need to provide details. If you don't see it, you're a lost cause.
22.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Bingo, I made the exact same comment. That was quite an effective way to take your credibility and shove it down the drain. They're all scumbags.
23.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
The theory has been in place for about 70 years.
24.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
> the ability to manufacture enough power plants to satisfy the current electrical demand of earth in a ten year period. LOL. Is Helion backed by the same VCs that back all those shitcoins?
25.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Almost all coins are money-grabs. At this stage I default to assuming a coin is a money grab, and expect them to convince me it's not. Maybe the person you were talking to is the same.
26.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Why exactly do you call S3 "centralized"? You can distribute it around the world if you choose to.
27.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
How else do you get rid of grease? The scattering of light on grease on the lenses is unbearable for me whenever I don't use dish soap.
28.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Haha laminar flow. So I'm not the only one. I always wondered.
29.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
Yes. And Julia also does the "optimized version of...". It dispatches on types.
30.
by sdfhdhjdw3 4y ago
My explanation, on the other hand, also explains why it's not a billion. So my explanation has more explanatory power than yours.

More ›