sdfasdfa

3 ms·

1. 1.▲
   by sdfasdfa 14y ago

   >>Not to pull the marxist analysis card BUT: bullshit. They were being paid an agreed upon percentage of the value they provided to the company. What is your point? Doesn't seem to contradict what I said. >>In this case the
2. 2.▲
   by sdfasdfa 14y ago

   >>I think you can make a strong argument that giving the company to your heirs whole-hog is a poor idea (unless those heirs are involved in the company personally) If you leave lots of money to your kids and never taught them from a
3. 3.▲
   by sdfasdfa 14y ago

   No. It should not. What will hurt them is how you raise them (By heirs I'm talking about children). Give them the best education money can buy and beyond the essentials (food, roof, clothes) make them work for whatever else they want. Want
4. 4.▲
   by sdfasdfa 14y ago

   >>He's giving it to his employees who presumably have worked for it with "blood and sweat" No they didn't. They were getting paid already for the value they provided to the company. Do not delude yourself, this is nothing more than
5. 5.▲
   by sdfasdfa 14y ago

   This is so unamerican. Giving stuff away for free is really bad. Teach a man to fish instead. Or rather, the man should be trying to learn to fish. It just feels so bad. Like spoiling a child. If you really want to help somebody you must re