scared_together

4 ms·

1.
by scared_together 5d ago
I’m not an American, but here in Canada there are a lot of extra fees and such where I live as well. I don’t believe the problem is purely innumeracy on the consumer’s part. If companies clearly stated “A(B + C)” as a price, even people wit
2.
by scared_together 5d ago
The statement that the set has 1 member is my criticism of the text, not what the text is trying to say. > given n species and the n * (n - 1) binary combinations possible, there are no examples of the said observation I would expect tha
3.
by scared_together 5d ago
Maybe another AI could use the proof.
4.
by scared_together 5d ago
> OBSERVATION: There are zero examples of any intelligent species which is vastly more capable than another species, yet surrenders decision-making control over its own future to the less-capable species. Does the set of intelligent spec
5.
by scared_together 6d ago
Not everyone would actually send the prompt to an LLM. Some would have the opportunity to see the prompt as its own artifact, devoid of LLM-generated “hallucinations”. > let the votes speak for that. The comment you are replying to got a
6.
by scared_together 6d ago
Are you referring to the Pangram link? I’d consider that akin to a reference supporting the comment’s point, not a substitute for the comment’s point. > Most people do not, in fact, want to read raw prompts. I wonder if this is really tr
7.
by scared_together 13d ago
I agree that models are improving. But is the improvement truly exponential?? Are the improvements we have seen from September 2025 to September 2026 really as significant as the improvements from September 2024 to September 2025? I’m genui
8.
by scared_together 14d ago
The comment I was replying to was complaining about appealing to the masses, emotional arguments, and compromising on certain issues to get progress on other issues. If you view a regime as fascistic, you still need to be able to do all t
9.
by scared_together 14d ago
> It's a herding/shepherding game where the only people willing to play are compromised. This is how all politics is, and frankly the existential risk crowd needs to learn how to play the game instead of complaining about it.
10.
by scared_together 22d ago
The comparisons to anti-vax and flat earth are absurd. And what exactly is the benefit to you to having a data centre specifically in the area you live? Seems to me that far from “irrational hordes”, the protestors are standing up for t
11.
by scared_together 23d ago
If the causal analysis is the real value, then it could be presented without a prediction, or at least without a specific prediction. In 2024, if Ed Zitron presented all his analysis of AI companies without the specific “model capabilities
12.
by scared_together 23d ago
> Not sure how you constructed that specific sentence from my message. Fair enough, I didn’t. > most big decisions aren't that sensitive to small timing changes That makes sense for a single year at least.
13.
by scared_together 24d ago
The added value other than the stock market would be in making major life decisions. In the case of the 2008 crisis, specific knowledge of the timing could matter for buying or selling a house. In the case of technological predictions, spec
14.
by scared_together 24d ago
The post is titled “How accurate have Ed Zitron's AI skeptic predictions been?” not “How accurate will Ed Zitron’s AI skeptic predictions be in the future?” or “Is the entire AI industry build out justified?” If Patrick Boyle, Aswath
15.
by scared_together 24d ago
First of all thanks for actually replying with a full list. > Claiming it's a fail for being 1 second late is not a rational position and not at all in the spirit the predictions were made. I would keep to the level of precision the
16.
by scared_together 24d ago
They’ll never get better if not held accountable.
17.
by scared_together 24d ago
> The prediction was early, overestimated how long of a tail RIM would experience, but how wrong was it? Was the prediction of some utility? Wrong enough that the utility is seriously diminished. Predicting a specific quantity dropping t
18.
by scared_together 24d ago
You "asked"? Who (or more likely, what) did you ask? Dan Luu's analysis of Kurzweil is in this article: https://danluu.com/futurist-predictions/ In the "Appendix: detailed information on predictions
19.
by scared_together 24d ago
I can agree that the Gemini usage number is a marketing number NOT to be taken at face value. And so does Dan Luu, in the "Some reactions to Zitron" section of the article: > BTW, a funny thing about Gemini hitting 500M users b
20.
by scared_together 27d ago
Hey, thanks for taking the time to respond to feedback. I believe there is a societal problem here, not specific to your particular actions. The expectation that communications should be “cleaned up” and “professional” in the first place co
21.
by scared_together 27d ago
> AI is a tool. It outputs things only when asked to. This is not entirely accurate if we consider agentic loops. > Asking it requires skill. Considering the realm of writing a blog post instead of programming, what is the skill? I su
22.
by scared_together 1mo ago
I currently don’t use ad blockers. The only time I used ad blockers was when a previous employer specifically asked me to, when using a company machine. > Can't understand why they put up with it To see which (rare) sites don’t put
23.
by scared_together 2mo ago
It may be an artistic/engineering choice to demonstrate what minimizing bloat to an extreme degree looks like. https://danluu.com/web-bloat/
24.
by scared_together 2mo ago
Is Gruber actually against AI-built apps? He was against the unofficial Mac port of Notepad++ but that had many problems other than being AI-assisted.
25.
by scared_together 2mo ago
The essay is more concerned with the definition of “technology” than the definition of “science fiction”. It merely points out that distinguishing between hard and soft sci-fi by the presence of technology is folly, since even Bronze Age te
26.
by scared_together 2mo ago
Have you read the article? > For years now, the testers at DoesItPlay have been documenting this trend, testing thousands of physical game releases to see which ones live up to the promise of full “plug and play” functionality without an
27.
by scared_together 2mo ago
> That’s how we train Pangram: for every element of our dataset of commercially licensed human-written texts, we generate an AI double that is as close as possible to its source. The doubles are the same length, same tone, same topic, bu
28.
by scared_together 3mo ago
> I think part of the answer is that AI chat doesn't need to be general-purpose. It turned out that people really liked using a chat UI that seems to be general purpose, but you don't need to make answering any question a user
29.
by scared_together 3mo ago
It’s the “decoy text” intended to trick LLMs, from the arricle: > The decoy message serves as a final trick for a determined agent. When looking for a hidden message, it might first find the decoy message and think that that is the real
30.
by scared_together 3mo ago
The article mentions bronze production (thus indirectly mentioning copper and tin) not as a root cause, but rather a factor that spread the crisis from one region to another: > What is clear is that once the collapse started, it was cont

More ›