saurik

35 ms·

301.
by saurik 1y ago
3 hexadecimal digits and one # symbol is 4 characters.
302.
by saurik 1y ago
I mean... how about "example"? I feel as if I were to give what you just said to someone a hundred years ago, with no context of AI training or even of the discussion, the very form of what your response leads to the answer "
303.
by saurik 2y ago
When I use a service over TLS on a network I don't trust, the premise is that I only will trust the connection if it has a certificate from a handful of companies trusted by the people who wrote the software I'm using (my browser&
304.
by saurik 2y ago
The concept of a file only sort of gets modeled within the scope of what a directory is, with generic tooling; otherwise, you just have "documents". And there is also a big difference between really knowing what it is, and doing i
305.
by saurik 2y ago
I am on Arch and often end up with DNS broken in a way that requires me to restart tailscaled.
306.
by saurik 2y ago
I find your definition of "insulting" really confusing, as pretty much all "white collar jobs" are "I sit on my butt all day and think lazily about things with very little pressure" jobs. They push paper and wr
307.
by saurik 2y ago
I am pretty sure that they must have meant "up through", not "up to", as the answer from o3-mini-high is also wrong in a way which seems to fit the same description, no?
308.
by saurik 2y ago
> I was talking with friends at a party last night about their white collar jobs, .... One friend had just finished a 3 month program to certify to fly a certain type of airliner. An airline pilot is "grey collar". https:&#x2F
309.
by saurik 2y ago
This phenomenon is why I personally get so angry at the license washing that these models are capable of for code: I put out a lot of code as open source... but it is GPL on purpose, as I want your code to be just as free as mine in exchang
310.
by saurik 2y ago
But, in that case, shouldn't they be using | here?
311.
by saurik 2y ago
> When prompted to adopt a humanlike persona, ... [I am now going to do these in reverse order of the original.] > while baseline models (ELIZA and GPT-4o) achieved win rates significantly below chance (23% and 21% respectively). That
312.
by saurik 2y ago
While we all do need trucks, some people and some businesses cause the need for more trucks than other people. Just because something is provided by government doesn't entirely divorce it from capitalism.
313.
by saurik 2y ago
I think I might, and I'm surprised by how confident you are that you wouldn't.
314.
by saurik 2y ago
> Section 230 protects individual bloggers, anyone who forwards an email, and social media users who have ever reshared or retweeted another person’s content online. If someone you have never heard of writes a letter -- on paper, with a
315.
by saurik 2y ago
AFAIK, SMTP requires the message-id header, so this "upstream" of which you speak must be outside of the scope of email infrastructure. In this case, looking at this article, the API for sending an email using broken-apart compone
316.
by saurik 2y ago
But isn't that what we'd expect? It is kind of ridiculous to insist that a decentralized system out-compete a centralized one on axes such as expense or complexity or performance. The reality is that we do now have a ton of decent
317.
by saurik 2y ago
The existence of 230 propping up and effectively subsidizing centralized systems actually is in a non trivial manner. A centralized system with a single giant point of failure is always going to be cheaper and/or easier for users, so a
318.
by saurik 2y ago
I'm confused by this discussion as this back/forth makes it sound like this is some kind of little-known e-mail feature, but every single e-mail must have this unique-id, so how is this problem even coming up in the first place?
319.
by saurik 2y ago
Those trucks are doing things for people, and different people cause different amounts of trucks. If you have some cool use case for a ton of trucks--as a consumer, buying a kind of product or service that causes trucks to go back and forth
320.
by saurik 2y ago
I fully understand why they do it, and yet I choose to interpret it as blatantly lying. (To be clear I mean the thing where OpenAI seems to announce things relating to news cycles without actually having the thing working yet; I don't
321.
by saurik 2y ago
Wow! Do you then use white board erasers, chalk board erasers, paper towels, microfiber clothes, squeegees ;P, or what do you use then to erase?
322.
by saurik 2y ago
To be fair (not that they deserve it, and to be clear: I do agree with you 1000%), Cloudflare has been known to push crazy shit to production that breaks MAJOR browsers without seemingly noticing or caring, as in this story of my debugging
323.
by saurik 2y ago
FWIW, 100% is unrealistic, as you would hire a personal assistant to do these kinds of tasks, and the personal assistant can be scammed, blackmailed, make stupid mistakes, or even be a foreign double agent. The problem is that, right now, A
324.
by saurik 2y ago
I really liked the Tesla virtual gear shift stalk. I used to drive old cars (such as an early-80s Cadillac) that had a real gear shift stalk, and making that stateless--with multiple pushes to change to a gear--felt quite intuitive in a rea
325.
by saurik 2y ago
Such CGNAT should also be more likely to support PCP than a normal NAT. It does suck that, AFAIK, no browser has integrated support for this into their WebRTC stacks :/.
326.
by saurik 2y ago
I am not seeing that? Like, vs. old versions of Zulu, sure; but the 17/18 seem about the same to me?
327.
by saurik 2y ago
FWIW, this doesn't actually imply we disagree, as maybe the vast majority of NATs aren't in your country ;P... we could both be right!
328.
by saurik 2y ago
That doesn't work with "symmetric" NAT, which was specified by the person you are responding to: in that case, you can't rely on even a third party to figure out the port. To the extent to which this NAT paradigm is chos
329.
by saurik 2y ago
WebRTC, in fact, merely passes e2e encrypted packets through the TURN server (which, by the way, is only required if both sides are behind symmetric NAT: the vast majority of NAT doesn't cause this problem, though you might need to d
330.
by saurik 2y ago
A big reason the GNU utilities were game changing is not because of their existence, or their functionality, but because of their license... a license which, in no small part, is what not merely motivated but then allowed for their continue

More ›