saurik

28 ms·

331.
by saurik 2y ago
I honestly clearly don't understand the downstream disagreement myself, am getting tired of being shouted at today, and feel like entering this part of the thread by replying to someone who was clearly already past their breaking point
332.
by saurik 2y ago
> This is very naive. How many different APIs have you authenticated with and connected to? Just the big ones? I mean, a lot? I have multiple times felt like that was my entire life for weeks or months on end during the past over three d
333.
by saurik 2y ago
I am not even the person who said "I wouldn't call it another form of API"... can you maybe just stick to the concrete and explain how this is different from SOAP/WSDL or OpenAPI/Swaggar? I honestly don't even
334.
by saurik 2y ago
I don't understand your response as it feels like it is also my point, and something I would say to you? :( If the LLM cannot do basic tasks such as this, what are you going to do? Keep throwing more "tools" at it and hope to
335.
by saurik 2y ago
This is like the simplest task you can give a software developer, as it is nigh-unto merely a document "translation" task, without much real thought required. If an LLM is failing to do this task, why do we hope whatever chain of
336.
by saurik 2y ago
I didn't have a good term so I went with "API layer" (not merely "API"), but, to try to clarify... that's what you also get with SOAP/WSDL or any of the other numerous attempts over the years to build an A
337.
by saurik 2y ago
1) Ok, so you are reinventing SOAP or WSDL or whatever... did that ever go well? How and why is this different from every prior attempt to create the one true API layer? 2) Is this meaningfully different from just having every API provide a
338.
by saurik 2y ago
This should be held up as a visceral demonstration of how the "slippery slope" isn't inherently a fallacy, as many oft like to claim: it is merely a form of argument that is easy enough to get wrong--leading to a fallacy when
339.
by saurik 2y ago
This link is actually to an spammy "Are You a Rich Couple? Here's the Net Worth You Need to Be Wealthier Than 95% of Households" article. Here is a real link to a real article titled "Conflict-of-interest questions surfa
340.
by saurik 2y ago
It feels like a core part of your claim--at least half of it--relies on most software for "Wintel computers" being written in garbage collected languages, which would be shocking if it were true.
341.
by saurik 2y ago
I am pretty sure dtach is in Homebrew, but maybe you specifically like the exact set of tradeoffs from shpool.
342.
by saurik 2y ago
What I honestly find most interesting about this is the thought that hallucinations might lead to the kind of emergent language design we see in natural language (which might not be a good thing for a computer language, fwiw, but still inte
343.
by saurik 2y ago
> Even at the lowest 2.5mg starter dose which you're only allowed to stay on for 1 month... So they are going to force you onto a higher dose?!
344.
by saurik 2y ago
(Would others? I don't think I have ever seen anyone defend that part of the equation. With Wikipedia's similar insanity--begging for donations to keep their servers on when they don't spend the money on that--I have at least
345.
by saurik 2y ago
I mean, the point that a physical button (even if it were backed by software, due to the PIN code lock feature) would be appreciated certainly resonates, but it's at least somewhat better than that ;P... open the menu--which probably
346.
by saurik 2y ago
The issue is kind of on the other side, though: you can pay more to improve your cooling in a way that might be quieter or better; but, if you absolutely do not want any fan noise--nor any fragile mechanical motors to move air/water&#x
347.
by saurik 2y ago
In 2006, Symantec ran a programming competition of sorts for University students, where you had to write code for a tiny bot that was trying to collect as many resources as possible from the game map. What made it particularly interesting w
348.
by saurik 2y ago
They don't seem to care about needing a fan, and the community on their forums is actively hostile--even brutal--to people who don't want a fan (the zeitgeist there seems to believe that any compromise to performance at all costs
349.
by saurik 2y ago
The way to analyze this is using pixel density: 1900x1200 on a 12" display is only 187 PPI, which is frustratingly below the "retina" range at the usual distance of a laptop screen (much less a tablet one, and this one is par
350.
by saurik 2y ago
WebRTC runs SCTP over DTLS over UDP.
351.
by saurik 2y ago
Is that really the claim, though? If someone chooses to punish DigiCert for compliance with the TRO then DigiCert might have grounds to file for declarative relief from the court, as the court could very well decide to help protect DigiCert
352.
by saurik 2y ago
I can declare my right to do something as much as I want... that doesn't mean I get to do it, certainly not if a judge decides I can't.
353.
by saurik 2y ago
The real question: do we invite another country to take their seat, or do we rename the arrangement to Four Eyes?
354.
by saurik 2y ago
But like, the expert also knows that the middle-of-the-bell-curve engineer makes mistakes and knows not to blindly trust their code; meanwhile, the person who is "incompetent at a topic" could be seen literally hiring the middle
355.
by saurik 2y ago
I have worn glasses since I was a kid, and I didn't ever really mind too much (though I'm starting to be bummed out by it now that I'm in my 40s and my eye accommodation is starting to noticeably atrophy), but... you "re
356.
by saurik 2y ago
Not always insisting upon measuring is not the same thing as an inability to measure when it would actually help.
357.
by saurik 2y ago
There might not be end-to-end hand-holding for how to do it, but all of the needed tools are documented, and each one is individually supported. All you are doing is using clang to build a binary -- the same way you would build a binary in
358.
by saurik 2y ago
1) To the extent to which you can't ask them to change their CGNAT setup, you also can't "just" ask them to upgrade to IPv6. 2) In fact you at least can ask them to change their CGNAT setup, as they at least could , i
359.
by saurik 2y ago
> From there, compiling code for iOS is notoriously difficult and not officially supported outside of using Xcode. I mean, this is a stretch... you really have to go out of your way to narrowly define "officially supported" to
360.
by saurik 2y ago
Your article isn't really about, though, how to speed up a debug build, and I thereby think you're likely not going to find the right audience. Like, to be honest, I gave up on your article, because while I found the premise of sp

More ›