5 ms·
Such CGNAT should also be more likely to support PCP than a normal NAT. It does suck that, AFAIK, no browser has integrated support for this into their WebRTC s
by saurik 2y ago
Such CGNAT should also be more likely to support PCP than a normal NAT. It does suck that, AFAIK, no browser has integrated support for this into their WebRTC stacks :/.
- nikisweeting 2y agoTIL about PCP, didn't realize anything came after NAT-PMP! and also wow I'm honored to get a reply from a childhood hero of mine. I've been a diehard Cydia fan since 2010!