sarabande

16 ms·

1. 151.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   I agree with most of your post, although I think your last paragraph has orthogonal arguments, perhaps you can help me understand. 1. If you work at a company with great purpose for humanity, then you can be satisfied with working 40 hours
2. 152.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   I don't think the OPs statement is all that unrealistic, especially for a single male. Perhaps an upper bound would be 50% plus his estimate, but even me, who I don't consider a ridiculous saver of time, shower within 5 minutes (f
3. 153.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   According to the PostScript file here: https://people.math.osu.edu/gerlach.1/laser/you_and_your_res... , October 1993.
4. 154.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   I understand this is a juicy story -- but forgive me, how is this not considered off-topic given the HN guideline: Off-Topic: Most stories about politics, or crime, or sports, unless they're evidence of some interesting new phenome
5. 155.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   Can you expand on this? Is it because of the opportunity cost of working during that time, or because you have to work so hard that the small positive amount of money you come away with is not worth your labor?
6. 156.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   Also, although difficult, Gaussian blurs can be in certain cases reversed (even though this one is so obvious there was no point in blurring the names). I prefer a fat black box when censoring.
7. 157.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   A quick search on Stack Overflow careers shows that while there are many Berlin startups that don't pay well compared to U.S. salaries (say, 60k€ range), there are also a lot of multinationals that pay great salaries; I've seen se
8. 158.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   I agree with your argument that since consumers are the ones who demand the product, they are the reason such companies exist. However, customers typically have little information on how many greenhouse gases are produced for a given produc
9. 159.▲
   by sarabande 9y ago

   One way to calculate this would be to use this controversy formula ( https://math.stackexchange.com/a/318510/10887 ) on all comments of a user whose total karma exceeds a certain threshold, say 1000, and then add up
10. 160.▲
    by sarabande 9y ago

    To give credit where it is due, this especially funny quote is nearly verbatim copied from the original article ( https://medium.freecodecamp.com/welcome-to-the-software-inte... ) from which "inspiration" for this o
11. 161.▲
    by sarabande 9y ago

    I find it interesting that when the NN fails to complete the whole puzzle, it seems to fail spectacularly (github.com/Kyubyong/sudoku#results) -- that is, there aren't a lot of good-partial attempts (90% or above). Does anyon
12. 162.▲
    by sarabande 9y ago

    Are there any books you would recommend for marketing techniques? The frameworks you mentioned piqued my interest.
13. 163.▲
    by sarabande 10y ago

    You don't need parallel corpora -- the OP was generating the incorrect versions of training data through random perturbation (dropping articles, etc.)