sahil50

13 ms·

61.
Satoshi leaked his Los Angeles IP address (2016)(whoissatoshi.wordpress.com)
183 points by sahil50 5y ago|164 comments
62.
I’m the “SpaceX intern” who said Satoshi is Elon Musk. There's more to the story(medium.com)
7 points by sahil50 5y ago|4 comments
63.
I’m the “SpaceX intern” who said Satoshi is Elon Musk. There's more to the story(medium.com)
6 points by sahil50 5y ago|2 comments
64.
The Big Circus cosmological model(youtube.com)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
65.
by sahil50 5y ago
I expect we'll see more mature galaxies in the distant universe. This is a glaring problem for the standard model (big bang LCDM) right now. XMM-2599, SPT0418-47, MRG-M2129, all mature galaxies, far away
66.
MOND vs. Dark Matter, a side by side comparison(arxiv.org)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
67.
A Large Numbers Hypothesis Returns(drive.google.com)
3 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
68.
I found a symmetrical coincidence involving all the fundamental constants(medium.com)
5 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
69.
A Large Numbers Coincidence(medium.com)
7 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
70.
A likely expression for the fine structure constant(codesandbox.io)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|1 comments
71.
Problems with the Big Bang Theory(youtube.com)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
72.
The Top 30 Problems with the Big Bang Theory (2002)(spaceandmotion.com)
53 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
73.
by sahil50 5y ago
Heads up: click "Use Planck's constant", otherwise Wolfram Alpha assumes h is hours.
74.
by sahil50 5y ago
Can we consider a few other possibilities? As in, taking the point of view of cosmology about 100 years ago, before the redshift was attributed to the Doppler effect. And before the notion of a big bang was the default basis of reasoning. -
75.
by sahil50 5y ago
Sure there many coincidences that are meaningless. I think this one stands out because it has to do with charge & gravity, and protons, electrons, & photons. Which are the stable & abundant "things" in the universe.
76.
Show HN: I was playing with fundamental constants and 13.8 b years popped out
56 points by sahil50 5y ago|6 comments
77.
Two Early yet Mature Galaxies: Rare objects or is Big Bang model inaccurate?(cosmologyscience.com)
1 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
78.
11B years ago we had same Ratio of Old (red) to New (blue) Galaxies(cosmologyscience.com)
1 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
79.
The Universe’s children: Born as lively teenagers and older than their parents(cosmologyscience.com)
1 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
80.
by sahil50 5y ago
Cut the sarcasm because it's going to backfire. That there are galaxies that appear more frequently at 500 million light-years from each other, is the raw fact. I've read the papers that say that raw fact is proof of big bang LCDM
81.
by sahil50 5y ago
You misread. The cosmological redshift is not attributable to galaxies receding. The cosmological redshift is photons losing energy as they forge a path through the gravitationally connected universe. It's the cost of traveling. Total
82.
by sahil50 5y ago
How do you know?
83.
by sahil50 5y ago
Maybe. But my reasoning is to assume as little as possible and start reasoning up from the point in history where the need for an explanation arose. And the need for an explanation arose when Hubble saw the redshift. He and Zwicky preferred
84.
by sahil50 5y ago
How so? Considering all the data on redshift we have, tired light fits. Not galactic recession. Rough calculations https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HI61-pDIzzSItw48K0ga... Data from https://ned.i
85.
by sahil50 5y ago
The standard argument is a straw man argument. Tired light is not photons getting scattered, and is not photons bumping into stray electrons. Tired light is because there is a cost to traveling through spacetime. The photon is warping the s
86.
by sahil50 5y ago
Hubble's constant is related to all the other fundamental constants. And is not a measure of "expansion", which is one of the core ideas of the Standard Model. Relation to the cosmological principle: self-similarity not just
87.
by sahil50 5y ago
What Hubble objectively measured wasn't galaxies receding. He measured redshift. Or photon energy loss. And there's another way to explain this, that is simpler, self-consistent, and doesn't require the concept of "infla
88.
by sahil50 5y ago
Photon hubbling, tired light. The photon is doing work as it moves through spacetime. Modeled as E_t / E_0 = e^(-Ht), where H is Hubble's constant, and t is time of travel.
89.
by sahil50 5y ago
(1/H * c) = (1/α * ke^2 / (electron mass * c^2)) * (h / (proton mass * c * pi/2)) / (2G * proton mass / c^2)
90.
by sahil50 5y ago
Another problem with the standard model is attributing the cosmological redshift to the Doppler effect.

More ›