sahil50

14 ms·

91.
by sahil50 5y ago
Considering all the redshift data we have, galactic recession does not fit. Rough calculations https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1HI61-pDIzzSItw48K0ga... Data from https://ned.ipac.caltech.edu&#x2F
92.
by sahil50 5y ago
Crawford addresses what you're saying in this paper. https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237
93.
by sahil50 5y ago
Now that's false. The point is that the data calibration mechanism introduces bias before any analysis has been made. The data is calibrated to assume galactic recession. That's the problem.
94.
by sahil50 5y ago
Never said that. I'm solid on speed of light as a max, gravitational lensing, gravitational redshift, and all the real world measurements that are in total sync with relativity. The point is that I think claims like "distance does
95.
by sahil50 5y ago
"Sun->Earth or Sun->Jupiter is a small beer"? How do you mean? This is a real physical example with real physical consequences for example for how much dimmer the light is per area (by 1/r^2) and by how much redder it i
96.
by sahil50 5y ago
Why are you bringing up something else? Awaiting your commentary on the big 3 rebuttals of tired light, and the rebuttals of those rebuttals.
97.
by sahil50 5y ago
I don't think it is true to say that "it is emitted and absorbed immediately", because there is a very real difference from a photon going from the Sun to the Earth, to a photon going from the Sun to Jupiter. I know the theor
98.
by sahil50 5y ago
Thanks for linking. So this paper is from 2001. Whereas SALT2 is from 2007. https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2007/16/aa6930-06.pdf This 2001 paper uses a correction template that I think is a v
99.
by sahil50 5y ago
Thank you
100.
by sahil50 5y ago
I await your commentary on the SALT2 calibration mechanism. This is the point where bias is introduced. The supernovae light curve data was biased before any analysis made.
101.
by sahil50 5y ago
Thoughts on gravitational lensing point above? From the photon's point of view, it is experiencing changes through time and space.
102.
by sahil50 5y ago
The photon does experience change over time and space. Take gravitational lensing by the Sun. The photons that we see from behind the Sun, are definitely affected by the Sun. From the photon's point of view, it is experiencing changes
103.
by sahil50 5y ago
E_measured / E_emitted = e^(-d / H'c) e is 2.718... d is distance of travel H' is 13.83 billion years, the continuous decay rate Rough calculations https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/13aRdc
104.
by sahil50 5y ago
Penrose's observations of evaporated black holes in the cosmic background radiation map are really interesting. This is a big reason to think there are structures older than 13.8 billion years.
105.
by sahil50 5y ago
What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237 . - The 2.7 K cosmic backgrou
106.
by sahil50 5y ago
What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237 . - The 2.7 K cosmic backgrou
107.
by sahil50 5y ago
What if I could rebut all the rebuttals? - The analysis of supernovae light curves is calibrated in a way that presumes galactic recession. More detail here https://arxiv.org/abs/1711.11237 . - The 2.7 K cosmic backgrou
108.
by sahil50 5y ago
Where does your claim that photons don't move come from? Very simply, the Sun is 8 minutes from the Earth. The photon is most definitely moving from the Sun to the Earth.
109.
by sahil50 5y ago
What if the cause of the cosmological redshift is continuous photon decay? Not galactic recession, but photon hubbling, or tired light? www.bigcircusmodel.org
110.
Big Circus Model(bigcircusmodel.org)
4 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
111.
The radius of the universe isn't an accident
3 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
112.
Show HN: Large Numbers Hypothesis Revisited
64 points by sahil50 5y ago|1 comments
113.
Show HN: Deriving Hubble's constant from fundamental constants(colab.research.google.com)
62 points by sahil50 5y ago|3 comments
114.
by sahil50 5y ago
Wyler's derivation of the fine structure constant might be the accurate one, and what the Machine will churn out sooner or later. Resembles the Stefan Boltzmann constant in form and function.
115.
Relating the universe radius to electric, strong, and gravity forces(twitter.com)
1 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
116.
The fine structure constant from proton and electron mass and charge radius(twitter.com)
2 points by sahil50 5y ago|0 comments
117.
by sahil50 6y ago
Did you see there was evidence brought forward that the domain was bought in bad faith??
118.
by sahil50 6y ago
How can you be so gullible to believe the perspective of that news site?
119.
by sahil50 6y ago
The year bought is not the only thing that matters. Other factors include history of squatting. And whether the domain was bought in bad faith.
120.
by sahil50 6y ago
Definitely this: (i) change the bad faith registration “and” use element to bad faith registration “or” use – to address scenarios where an older domain name openly infringes a newer brand; https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine

More ›